>>581261
Getting confused around here (is normal ;) ):
Didn't Q refer to Snowden as @Snowden?
And didn't Q refer to the former chairman of Alfabet/Google/whatever as ES (meaning Eric Schmidt)? Just for clarity, I don't know all Qposts by heart (although I should by now).
I catch your drift but maybe stick to convention to help the readability of the narrative?
I never trusted one cent of this Snowden guy/story. Clown trying to score browniepoints with the 'public', get streetcred and be the perfect plant. JA bit similar in that respect, check out his history/roots/parents. my 2ç