Anonymous ID: db5306 March 7, 2018, 3:43 p.m. No.582218   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2256 >>2377

Was out and missed the action earlier anons, I've read the last few breads and want to throw out some of my observations.

 

How did @Snowden clear customs/immigration in HK AFTER the public release?

 

>US Gov/C_A along with China allowed him to.

 

Why wouldn’t he FIRST travel to final destination prior to public release?

 

>Because if he released it from within Russia, the perception would be that he was a Russian Agent. He had to release it before so it would look like he was on the run rather than affiliated with any one country. Remember he was initially trying to get to Ecuador like JA.

 

If wanted by the US govt would he be cleared to travel?

 

>Never.

 

Who provided support to escape?

 

C_A and probably China.

 

Who was the US after during this time?

 

>Anyone else notice an obvious omission of a word or two in this line? Remember, omissions are relevant!

 

JA - have you learned & eliminated L-6?

 

>Not sure what L-6 is. In a search I found that it is a type of steel, though I'm not sure how that would relate to JA.

 

"L-type tool steel is short for low alloy special purpose tool steel. L6 is extremely tough."

 

https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tool_steel

 

Use logic.

 

>I'm trying'!

 

Q

Anonymous ID: db5306 March 7, 2018, 3:48 p.m. No.582261   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2271 >>2294 >>2301

Who controls social media?

 

>C_A

 

Who performs in a circus?

 

Clowns

 

Who wrote the code to embed and censor across multiple platforms?

 

>@Snowden

 

Why Russia?

Why China?

Why HK?

 

>None have extradition agreements with the US. All have harsh censorship laws.

 

Why did ES (himself) arrange a C-link in multiple countries?

 

>Remember this ES is Eric Schmidt, not @Snowden.

I assume he did it himself so that it would be secret off the books from Google and be used as a way for the Cabal to secretly communicate with one another.

 

Learn.

 

>Tryin'!

 

Q

Anonymous ID: db5306 March 7, 2018, 3:55 p.m. No.582332   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Free speech does not apply in a private co setting.

 

>They don't have to recognize your 1A.

 

The risk?

 

>Why is this risky for them?

 

Loss of revenue.

 

>Because pissing all over half of your customers is usually not a good idea.

 

Backstopped by the circus.

 

>It doesn't matter though, because the C_A bankrolls these companies.

Remember how many times twitter nearly went bankrupt? Same shit that happens with Telsa, these companies, the way they operate would never survive in a free market.

 

Learn.

Social media control is everything.

 

>With the MSM and just TV on a whole going the way of the dino, Social Media is the new media and is the new tool/mouth-piece of the cabal, via the C_A.

 

The age of the MSM is over.

Q