>>5817300 lb

I find it wrong that Q posts about this woman.

Either she is guilty of something, then Q should bring this person to court, or she isn't.

But what Q does here, is in my opinion a character assassination/ because he doesn't prove anything.

You cannot do this.

This is wrong and Q should be called out for this.

I would sue him, if he would do this with me.

What if some idiot attacks her?

What then?

This is irresponsible!

And it is wrong.

Q, I wish, you would read this.

You are acting in a way, I will not condone.

And to all the biblefags:

There is no page in the bible where God condones such behaviour.

But there are passages in the bible, where people are warned of such behaviour.

>>5817718

I understand, what you write here.

But I still think that Q crossed a line yesterday and that he behaves in a way that I find unethical.

Q pushes people to become part of something, they shouldn't do.

And I find it sad that people don't call Q out for being not a decent person anymore.

Decent people don't make other people participants in a witch hunt.

Prove that she has committed crimes, or stop posting about her.

Why does Q never give evidence?

"We have it all."

But nobody gets publicly locked up?

No evidence shown?

All a secret?

If you cannot talk about certain things, maybe you shouldn't talk about them at all.

For the first time I want to call out Q, for what he yesterday did.

It was wrong and no better what people do to Trump.

>>5817750

>You know and everybody knows exactly what's going on here

Could you please reply to me and say, what you think is going on here?

Because I think that this just made a turn into something which is not acceptable.

>>5817969

I get, what you say.

But I'm deeply afraid that Q just lead us yesterday on a path that is wrong.

I can't ignore my conscience about what is acceptable and what is no longer acceptable.

Trump needs to find another way to make public, what he wants to be public.