Anonymous ID: 358218 March 21, 2019, 6:18 p.m. No.5819175   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9205 >>9214 >>9226 >>9241 >>9291 >>9313

Billionaire Hollywood mogul David Geffen announced another large philanthropic gift this week—one that could fully cement him as the most narcissistic and least useful philanthropist in America.

 

Geffen’s latest showy gift: a $100 million donation to UCLA to “establish a private middle and high school on the Westwood campus partly for the children of faculty and staff.” The underlying purpose of this school is to attract more prestigious faculty talent to UCLA. The LA Times reports that it will be “a recruiting and retention tool for faculty and scientists who may be worried about the cost of living in Los Angeles and the education system here.”

 

The name of the school? Do you even have to ask? “The Geffen Academy.”

 

To fully make clear what is happening here, David Geffen, a man worth $7 billion, is giving $100 million to build a private school that will cater to the already privileged employees of a top university, with the underlying purpose of allowing this university to compete for talent with other elite universities. He did not give money to LA’s beleaguered public school system. He did not even give money to, say, establish scholarships for poor kids to attend UCLA. He gave $100 million to build a private school for the children of UCLA faculty.

 

And he put his own name on it.

It's Not Charity If You Want Your Name on It

 

Very rich people sometimes make very large donations to educational or cultural institutions. In…

 

This is not even David Geffen’s grossest philanthropic gift. This is the same David Geffen, you’ll recall, who gave $100 million to Lincoln Center for the express purpose of putting his own name on the concert hall—going so far as to pay $15 million to the family of Avery Fisher, the guy whose name was already on the concert hall. Which is to say that on top of selecting one of the most elitist and unimportant charitable organizations on the face of the earth, David Geffen actually reduced his donation by $15 million explicitly out of a narcissistic desire to see his own name honored. It was the type of charitable donation that one hopes brings shame to David Geffen’s reputation, rather than the esteem he was so crudely seeking to buy. This pathological prestige-purchasing has been a hallmark of Geffen’s for decades. His name adorns museums and theaters and other such rich person charities of choice from coast to coast. So extreme is his desire for praise that even when he donates to a worthy charity like the food outreach program God’s Love We Deliver, he insists on having a building named for himself.

 

One hundred million dollars can do a lot of good. For example, GiveWell estimates that a donation of that size to the Against Malaria foundation could save nearly 30,000 lives. To repeat: this money could save thirty thousand human lives. Instead, David Geffen is building a private school with it so that his favorite university might gain a bit of prestige, if there is any left over after he has sucked it all in like a black hole. The same donation could have allowed Oxfam to build 66,000 schools for girls in developing countries. But certainly a private school for UCLA faculty is more important. One hundred million dollars could provide a year’s worth of safe drinking water to 119,000,000 people. To David Geffen, that is less important than seeing his own name engraved atop Lincoln Center.

 

Yes, charity is better than no charity. But no, all charitable giving is not created equal. When David Geffen decides to donate hundreds of millions of dollars to charities, he must then decide where that money goes, and how it is used. It could be used to save thousands and thousands of lives. Instead, it is used to glorify David Geffen.

 

No amount of money can disguise the fact that David Geffen is a rich prick.

 

https://gawker.com/david-geffen-americas-worst-philanthropist-1742100198

Anonymous ID: 358218 March 21, 2019, 6:28 p.m. No.5819352   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9379 >>9395 >>9399 >>9441 >>9527 >>9538 >>9641 >>9705

A controversial documentary that allegedly links X-Men director Bryan Singer to a gang of Hollywood pedophiles got its first – and possibly only – viewing in New York last night.

 

An Open Secret contains the astonishing revelation that a major child star was sexually abused by X-Men actor Brian Peck but refused to speak out for fear of wrecking his career.

 

Whilst there is no suggestion that Singer was involved in the abuse of the unnamed actor, Oscar-nominated director Amy Berg admitted she had yet to find any company willing to distribute the disturbing 100-minute film.

 

Stopping short of saying that Hollywood was protecting its own, Ms Berg confessed that even small movie festivals had refused to show An Open Secret.

 

‘We have this one screening. Maybe we will get distribution but it is not very likely,’ she said. ‘But people will talk about it.’

 

The documentary – discredited after one of the major accusers filed, then dropped lawsuits against Singer and three other men – finally aired at the Doc New York festival before 400 people in a quarter-empty Chelsea theater.

 

Singer, 49, gets several mentions in the film. He is shown in archive footage discussing X-Men and his inspirations, yet only once does his young male accuser Mark Egan allege impropriety.

 

Former child actor Egan filed lawsuits against Singer, TV executive Garth Ancier, Broadway producer Gary Goddard and ex Disney honcho David Neuman in California and Hawaii earlier this year alleging wide-scale sexual abuse, only to dramatically drop the action a few months later.

 

Egan is one of the major voices in the documentary and claims Singer, who vehemently denies the allegations, was one of the big players at drug-fueled male-only parties.

 

Emotions running high: Evan Henzi, 21, who had accused talent manager Marty Weiss of grooming him for sex abuse, wept throughout the movie

 

Emotions running high: Evan Henzi, 21, who had accused talent manager Marty Weiss of grooming him for sex abuse, wept throughout the movie

 

He alleges he and other young boys were urged to get naked in a hot tub with Singer and his middle-aged entertainment industry friends.

 

Amy Berg refused to cut Egan, who also sued another group of Hollywood players 10 years ago alleging similar abuse, from her documentary.

 

‘He puts Bryan Singer at the party,’ she told MailOnline. ‘He talks about him being at the party.’

 

Asked about 31-year-old Egan’s rocky history filing, then dropping, lawsuits, she snapped: ‘I met him two years ago and I am not changing my film.’

 

Berg, 44, uncovered large-scale sex abuse in the Catholic Church for her Oscar-nominated 2006 documentary Deliver Us From Evil.

 

The initial premise of An Open Secret was to follow the lives of five aspiring child stars whose innocence was destroyed by predatory older males in Hollywood.

 

Now adults, they tell how a network of Hollywood agents and managers including Bob Villard, who represented Leonardo DiCaprio and Tobey McGuire when they were children, abused them.

 

Villard was later convicted of selling images of young boys on eBay.

 

(more at link)

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2836062/Bombshell-documentary-Hollywood-pedophile-ring-preying-child-actors-s-linked-X-Men-director-Bryan-Singer-premiers-New-York.html