>>5819606 (lb)

Rachel Chandler google trends also knock that theory off considerably

past 24 hours and past 7 days.

Spike then near nothing. If indeed the RC drops were to have caused a spike of the magnitude seen on qanon.pub (allegedly) then that at the 'very' least would be reflected in the google trends - however it is not.

Again, the #'s by external trackers do NOT reflect anything remotely close to the alleged spike at qanon.pub

https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/qanon.pub

>>5819938

Ok.

Still does not support it.

>>5820005

dafuq did you do, take a thumb nail and enlarge it to 4k HD dimensions?

>>5820170

no, not only one

A few of us who have prof. knowledge of the field have been pointing out several things that poke pretty large holes in the narrative.

>>5820291

ok

but the twatter morons picking up just the Q drops and then brigading the social media accounts of those targeted are just causing all of us to look unhinged - and frankly, I cannot disagree with the normie assessment.

Unproven allegations made based on fucked up and/or poor taste pics and then making insane leaps of (lack of) logic to connect to what appears to be nothing but the stuff of tinfoil lined faraday cages… well

whatevs.