Repostan bc was at the end of the bread + very bad lag…
>[Rachel Chandler] > Idea
Using social media to gauge "customer" preferences
<too young, keep trying
Further…
Rachel Chandler
>Allison Mack x100
= procurer/facilitator
< what "looks" customers want
ages, sex, body type, race, etc.
-directly "in the know" of who is customer, who is trafficker (in possession of children)
>RACHEL CHANDLER IS KEY.
>This one case has the ability to bring down the (many) rich & powerful people.
→ HOLLYWOOD
#metoo + much worse
→ EPSTEIN
-rich, famous (celeb & non-celeb), business, politics
-international in scope
>Prince Andrew is deeply connected.
ROYAL family implicated
>Nicky Hilton
(before they were married)
I saw James R start a fight on fb between 2 female cousins over which one he liked fucking the most. Alistair came in and calmed the situation by saying - not kidding, not hyperbole, saw with me own 2 eyes:
< "Now now, girls, let's not fight in public like the goyim. There's plenty of James to go around"
SICK, DEMENTED, TWISTED, EVIL
tip of the iceberg, you have no idea…
What if Rachel has flipped?
What if she hasn't but Allison M has?
What if it's the reverse?
What is the overlap?
REMEMBER THE EO FROM 12/21 ABOUT "VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS"??? And how down the chain people can be implicated and their assets frozen?
Do you really understand what is at stake for these people?
Hence the panic-shilling is in overdrive…
THINK, CONNECT, REASSESS
FOCUS
Work TOGETHER