>>5820479 (lb)
so you're saying every person from social media that sees a Rachel Chandler Q drop knows who she is and why they should care? Or that none of them are curious enough to google it after seeing it on qmap?
that … stretches credulity, to say the least.
I have. Look in notables.
There's actually a generally downward trend over the past 7 days for Q/QAnon
There's nothing external to the # at the top of Qmap supporting the same number - strongly suggesting it's artificially inflated, be it intentional or accidentally.
any theory that requires 'everyone' or near to as not matter, for the hypothesis to be valid is in itself invalid.
facts don't care about your feelings. You can accept that there is nothing to support that # or you can choose to wrap yourself in a bubble of your own confirmation bias.
the choice is yours.
Eye Witness to Christchurch*
*via watching the live stream
Very RedPilled take from a semi-main stream pundit/commentator. Worth the watch, worth sharing as well.
even were google supressing the hit count, there would still be some rise.
Too many companies depend on their analytics being correct and un-fucked with, including close allies of (((them))) for google to risk fucking with 'that'.
besides, there's other sources that are also corroborating those data points.