For your edification anons
<<<<<<
Facial features look very similar.
Went to look up her dad (not successful yet) but found this instead. Haven't seen these honeymoon pics posted here yet.
Rachel Chandler’s Scenic Route
honeymoon pics with tom guinness
https://www.wmagazine.com/gallery/rachel-chandler-tom-guinness-honeymoonphotos/all
You're right, I'll look around some moar and see if "Dad" turns up anywhere public.
Check this out, anons.
Roger Carl Chandler
https://www.legacy.com/obituaries/appealdemocrat/obituary.aspx?n=roger-carl-chandler&pid=156735111
Roger Carl Chandler passed away peacefully on March 23, 2012 at the age of 85.
Roger was born October 19, 1926 in Marysville California, the son of W. Ray Chandler and Grace Johnson Chandler. Roger grew up on the family farm on Rednall Road in Sutter County; family legend has it that he regularly rode his horse to Bridge Street School in Yuba City. He graduated from Yuba City High School in 1944, and at the age of 17 joined the US army.
Roger attended UC Davis where he was editor of the 1948 yearbook and received his degree in pomology (the science of tree fruit) in 1949. He returned to Sutter County to begin his career as a farmer.
On June 11, 1949 Roger married Lois Jacqueline Kofahl. Roger and Jackie had two sons, Judge Chris Chandler of Yuba City, and Dr. Charles F. Chandler of Los Angeles.
Over the course of his career Roger farmed prunes, peaches, almonds and walnuts, pioneering the growing of walnuts in the Feather River river bottoms. He owned a soft water company, a boat business, a real estate brokerage (Roger C. Chandler and Associates) and was involved in real estate development.
Roger's commitment to volunteer service was deep. He served as a Cub Scout Pack leader, a member of the Sutter County Grand Jury, Sutter County Board of Education, Yuba-Sutter Fair Board and for many years was an active member and booster of the 4H/ FFA Junior Livestock Committee for the Yuba-Sutter Fair. He was a lifelong member of St. John's Episcopal Church in Marysville.
Roger had strong convictions and relished politics. He served on the Sutter County Republican Central Committee in the 1950's and 1960's. He was an alternate delegate for Barry Goldwater at the 1964 Republican National Convention. He was a seven-county campaign chairman for Ronald Reagan's first campaign for Governor in 1968. Roger served two terms on the Sutter County Board of Supervisors from 1980-1988. He was appointed to serve on two statewide boards by two California Governors.
Roger enjoyed pheasant and duck hunting, fishing, antique Fords, dominoes, growing vast quantities of backyard fruits and vegetables, and raising animals of all kinds. In what would today be called "the early empty nest phase", Roger briefly had over 20 Welsh ponies which he (with characteristic humor) called "Folly Farms".
Together, Roger and Jackie cherished good times with family and friends. They had many travel adventures, from single engine plane trips to El Salvador with Roger's brother Bob, to challenging the Swiss Alps in a four cylinder diesel car. For eleven years, Roger and Jackie lived in Inverness, the site of many fond and formative memories for their six grandchildren.
While he seldom spoke of it outside the family, Roger was extremely proud of his family and its background. On his father's side, he was an eleventh generation farmer in this country. He was very proud of his mom's family's more recent immigrant roots and the hardships they overcame. His grandfather, W. F. Chandler, was a long time member of the California Assembly and Senate from Fresno County and his parents were highly respected farmers and dairy operators in Yuba and Sutter Counties. He believed strongly in the dignity of hard work and the blessings that followed a commitment to family and community, whatever the individual's calling. He was delighted by his grandchildren, their families, and the character and promise he saw in each of them.
Roger was predeceased by his siblings Robert Chandler of Bend Oregon, Marion Rowe of Davis and Jean Davies of Sacramento, and granddaughter Katherine Reiko Chandler.
He is survived by his wife Jackie, sons Chris (Cindy) and Charlie (Becky), grandchildren Carolyn Ebert (Travis), Jessica Sanchez (William), Emily Chandler, Rachel Guinness (Tom), Natalie Chandler, and Michael Chandler, great grandchildren KC, Tatum and Peyton, and many cousins, nieces and nephews.
Just because someone is listed as the father doesn't mean he's the father (obviously). And I don't know for sure whether this is the real family tree, either.
Mike Rothschild think's Rachel's part of the newspaper magnate's family, but I couldn't find any refs that listed Rachel Chandler with either Otis or Norman (the newspaper people).
Here's what Rothschild says in a hit piece I just located on our investigation of Rachel (to be posted momentarily):
But after that, Q became hyperfocused on one particular person, and it’s someone that has no political footprint whatsoever: a photographer and casting director named Rachel Chandler, a member of the newspaper-dynasty Chandler family.
https://www.dailydot.com/layer8/qanon-rachel-chandler/
QAnon is attacking a random woman in a disturbing and dangerous way
Mike Rothschild— Mar 21 at 9:59AM | Last updated Mar 21 at 10:04AM
When anonymous conspiracy avatar QAnon blew another prediction, this time one that promised unspecified “PAIN” at the end of a 21-day countdown, the poster’s followers do what they always do: took it in stride.
But disturbingly, the QAnon poster refocused the subject of their cryptic posts away from the deep state and the ever-approaching Great Awakening and onto individual people. First came a series of portraits of Obama-era officials that followed posts referencing words like “kill” and “ammunition.” This came just days after the 8chan-driven massacre in Christchurch, New Zealand—and the posts were seen by many as a kind of hit list.
But after that, Q became hyperfocused on one particular person, and it’s someone that has no political footprint whatsoever: a photographer and casting director named Rachel Chandler, a member of the newspaper-dynasty Chandler family.
[''Rothschild probably has his facts wrong here'']
Q made a seemingly endless stream of posts referencing Chandler, insinuating that she took a 2017 picture of Bill Clinton and registered child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein (whose light prison sentence handed down by current Trump cabinet official Alexander Acosta is currently under investigation) hanging out together in a pool.
Beyond that, QAnon accused Chandler of “procuring” “girls” for Epstein, having her photography studio funded by elite Satanists who used it for rituals, flaunting Epstein’s “sex and torture room victims” with her pictures, having a link to a still-unexplained (yet supposedly horrific) event at the Standard Hotel in West Hollywood, of being “100 times” worse than cult-linked actress Allison Mack, and of being “the key” to the massive trafficking ring at the heart of Pizzagate.
All told, QAnon made nearly 30 posts referencing Chandler in some way, finishing with a link to the FBI’s tip website. The bullshit implication Q wants to make is clear: This woman is involved in things so terrible and evil that she must immediately be taken down by federal authorities. Or worse.
This isn’t even the first time QAnon has gone after Chandler, who did not return a request for comment from the Daily Dot. The poster attacked her in April 2018, linking her to supposed sex-trafficking related pictures on Instagram.
Well, the group is larger than that! Includes Travis View, Will Sommer, & Alephantis (sp?)–and others. She's pro'bly one of their pals. But WORTH A DIGG.
>https://gab.com/NeonRevolt/posts/WG1DblB4S1BEQmJROE05aXFHblpCZz09
I spoonfeed the Boomers daily, only to be on the receiving end of their incessant, naive, moralizing, stereotypically-clueless, and often "Jesus/Yeshua/Evangeliboomer-laden" lectures.
I'm a boomer, had no idea Neon Revolt was making such a sacrifice on my behalf. Kek.
The…uh…grey on grey motif is not very aesthetically pleasing. But black and white isn't very good either. Whose account was this???
I agree. I'm a strong supporter of multiple platforms and see those whose names are in the public eye as brave warriors who must take many slings and arrows. But the choice to be anon or non-anon is ours. Either way, it's tough at times. We have to keep our eyes on the goal, not one another.
then you must be an idiot to post here
We seem to have a lot of "helpers" in that dept. They are not a very positive lot, though. They're so extreme in their attitude that maybe we'll end up looking good by comparison.