Anonymous ID: d6f1fc March 7, 2018, 4:48 p.m. No.582853   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2888

>>582625

The countdown is highly significant because no one but CM or Q has the ability to control their post time to the second.

 

Need to translate it into a known timezone.

The 03:00:00 countdown graphic was posted in >>580381 in thread #715 at

16:00:00 Eastern Time.

 

Adding 3 hours for the countdown to reach zero, puts it at 19:00:00 eastern, or 7 PM.

Anonymous ID: d6f1fc March 7, 2018, 5:14 p.m. No.583157   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3174 >>3199 >>3205

>>582888

Is network latency predictable?

Is server latency predictable?

ESPECIALLY when, as you point out, there are ~500 posts per hour?

 

If they do it once, you could write it off as luck.

Twice, really improbable.

But more than twice - it is reasonable to deduce that someone is controlling the post time to the second, through unknown means.

 

(The formula to calculate a compound probability is p1 x p2 x p3 x … x pn. So just for the sake of example, if there is a 1% chance of purposely hitting a post time to the exactly 00 second, and you do it 3 times, then the probability is 1% x 1% x 1%. That is amounts to a 0.00001% chance, or one in a million, if my math is right. Now I do not know if a 1% probability is correct, it could be less or more (probably a lot less). But you see what my example is pointing to.

 

So there are plausible scenarios that could explain it. Should they be considered?

You are aware, right, that there is a military special operations unit that can inject network traffic, reroute packets, block data, hack servers, listen in on WiFi from an aircraft, whatever is lawful and necessary for them to do in a military operation directed by the chain of command. How difficult is it to imagine that Q desires these countdown posts to be made to the second?

 

BV is making a habit of trying to control and direct the conversation.

BV is making a habit of ridiculing anons who are considering different angles that BV never thought of.

Are we back to this kind of shameful thought-policing by BV?

I have been here since early November, 12-20 hours a day, every day.

I do not like thought-policing.

Here we are, together, fighting against internet censorship.

Do you find it ironic?

I do.

I am not a pelican.

I am not an idiot.

You do not know my technical background to confidently make assertions like these, but you are judging me and assuming a low-quality intellect with a desire to direct anons into false paths.

All I want is to serve God, country, family.

All I want is to serve Q and see this country restored back to virtue and honor.

BV I really think you should back off and stop ridiculing anons who are talking sense.

I don't like making a really long post like this but the situation calls for it.