>>5825365

The recent pressure by Q and lawsuit by Nunes might have Twitter backing off some of the shadow banning and suppression.

If they flipped a switch to stop it, we would see this type of jump in a really short time.

Honestly, if Q knew the suppression was going to stop after calling @Jack out, it would make sense why he then decided to re-hash the Ray Chandler stuff.

He basically ensured dozens of normie-bait style pics on a normie-bait style topic was flooded on to social media in a very short time.

It's a perfect "test run" to gather data on social media propagation before they drop anything new or significant.

>>5825613

Question:

Do bears shit in the woods?

Are they doing anything stinky?

>>5825590

People that bitch about notables in every bread, or bitch about the baking, are 95% of the time shills.

It's an extremely common shilling tactic that's used every single fucking day, week in and week out.

The remaining 5% are mid-wit anons who are too stupid to realize the notables are near worthless.

If a Baker is collecting Q drops and creating the new breads at a good interval allowing for seamless posting, then they are good.

That is literally all that matters.

>>5825813

That's a result of dilution of the userbase and posts due to our population spiking way up.