>>5825237

>there's no place to figure out these little nuggets without asking unfortunately

What the actual fuck?

You watch, you gather data, you look for patterns. That's what "researchers" do. THIS is the place either to figure out how to do that, or lurk quietly with the understanding that, until you do, you're better suited just to observe what happens here and spread what you learn on SocMed.

>then you're at the mercy of whomever wants to help or be a jerk.

Exactly. Our culture is designed to self-moderate by shaming ignorant fucks demanding to be spoonfed.

>>5825363

>You're good, anon. When conversing with anons, just pretend as if you are having a conversation with someone that has dissociative identity disorder.

Nice try pathologizing an opposing opinion. How Marxist of you. There is nothing inconsistent about our culture, Anons have been salty since the beginning. It's in our welcome statement that we're a "boot camp for the mind." We welcome all new would-be research contributors and those that observe and disseminate what we find here. But we're not a feel-good chat room for the lazy to hang out and dilute the efforts of our research with inane questions and platitudes. Q came here so autists could be autists.

>>5825487, >>5825502

>no, sorry metalbaker who was banned, it's YOU trying to confuse people with your "baker assist" faggotry.

Agreed.

This "baker assist" nonsense is turning into a pattern not an exception.

It was meant for times when miscommunication happened such that baker came in late bread, or when cleaning up after an ebake.

It was never meant to be "team baking."

You've been told this. Again and again.

And Anons will be here to say it as often as it needs saying.

We don't want team baking.

We don't want a "baker assist" faggot "BA" position.

Either bake as bakers bake, or cry somewhere else about how you can't.

>>5825559

>as a baker i never liked them, too much hassle for so little return.

Yeah and I've heard you say that before too, you enabling fucking faggot. If notables are so unimportant, then why does everyone fight over them so much?

How the fuck can you call yourself a baker and NOT take notables seriously.

You can fuck right off too.

Bakers are Anons, but they're still accountable to our standards. Notables have objective standards. It's baker's discretion how to apply them, but it is NOT their discretion to disregard them entirely and rewrite how we do things.

>>5825580

Nominate one or two per post, not more than 10 per bread, as a very general guidepost to whether an "anon" is being helpful, or being a process-disrupt superfaggot.

FUCK. OFF.