dChan
Anonymous ID: 5a30c1 March 22, 2019, 9:48 a.m. No.5827605   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://www.google.com/sky/

 

Step 1: Click at Constellations - bottom left

Step 2: Click at Virgo - bottom right

Step 3: Click at Infrared - top right

Step 4: (((Think)))

Anonymous ID: 5a30c1 March 22, 2019, 9:55 a.m. No.5827689   🗄️.is 🔗kun

 

Q put out a lot for the deep state actors to digest. Lots of panic I imagine. Lots of scared overlords. Now Q Will sit back and watch them react. Panicked phone call, emails, text messages and chat room communication will commence. They are desperate to get their stories strsight. In communicating that intent, they dig their own grave.

Anonymous ID: 5a30c1 March 22, 2019, 9:58 a.m. No.5827725   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7731

No More Indictments Expected in Mueller Probe

 

For over two years now, the radical left has convinced itself that Donald Trump wasn’t a fairly elected president, that he and his campaign colluded with Russia, who somehow managed to change votes and pull off an unexpected victory on Election Day 2016. If anyone could find evidence of collusion, it was special counsel Mueller, with unlimited resources, and an army of anti-Trump investigators.

 

But liberals who have been chomping at the bit waiting for Mueller to come to their rescue and give cause for Trump’s impeachment and criminal prosecution should be bracing themselves to be hugely disappointed. According to a recent report, no more indictments are expected as part of the Mueller probe, according to ABC News.

 

There's no shortage of speculation on special counsel Robert M ueller’s report, much of it totally uninformed.

But we don't need to speculate on the scope – the man who appointed Mueller has already given us a potential road map on what to expect from the special counsel.

 

The bottom line: Do not expect a harsh condemnation of President Donald Trump or any of his associates if they have not been charged with crimes.

 

The road map comes in the form a little-noticed 12-page letter written by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein last June to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley.

 

In his letter, Rosenstein wrote, “Punishing wrongdoers through judicial proceedings is only one part of the Department's mission. We also have a duty to prevent the disclosure of information that would unfairly tarnish people who are not charged with crimes.”

 

Sources familiar with the investigation believe there are no more indictments coming from the special counsel. If Mueller follows the guidance of the man who appointed him and supervised his investigation, he cannot publicly disparage those who have not been charged with a crime.

Rosenstein is emphatic on this point: "In fact, disclosing uncharged allegations against American citizens without a law-enforcement need is considered to be a violation of a prosecutor's trust."

 

The Mueller probe has resulted in over 30 indictments and plea deals. Vox has compiled a list here, and you will notice something very interesting if you read through them: none of Trump’s business or campaign associates have been indicted for anything relating to collusion with Russia. George Papadopoulos, Paul Manafort, Rick Gates, Michael Flynn, Michael Cohen, Roger Stone… the left may have salivated each time one of them got ensnared by Mueller, but none of their legal troubles, despite being part of the Russia probe, brought us closer to evidence that Trump colluded with Russia. If anything, just the opposite. Michael Cohen, Trump’s personal attorney and fixer, enjoyed attorney-client privilege with Trump. If anyone had the goods on Russian collusion, it was him, and he showed he was more than willing to sing like a canary in the hopes of reducing his sentence, but when he testified before Congress as the Democrats’ star witness, he said he had no direct evidence of collusion. "Questions have been raised about whether I know of direct evidence that Mr. Trump or his campaign colluded with Russia. I do not. I want to be clear," he said.

 

The Mueller probe is just about over, as is the Democrats’ hopes of ousting Trump via impeachment. They’ll try to keep the dream alive with their own partisan investigations in the hopes of making it difficult for Trump to govern, or appoint a new Supreme Court justice in the event of a vacancy. Those will go nowhere, of course. At least one potential witness, Michael R. Caputo, is refusing to cooperate with the Democrats' witch hunt. After two years of an investigation that has become a distraction for the country, people are ready to move on—even if Democrats haven't gotten the message. The end of the Mueller probe may be the end of the Democrats’ impeachment fantasy, but things are only going to get uglier from there.

 

https://pjmedia.com/trending/no-more-indictments-expected-in-mueller-probe/

Anonymous ID: 5a30c1 March 22, 2019, 10:13 a.m. No.5827884   🗄️.is 🔗kun

So Who Are These Chandlers Who Want to Reclaim ‘L.A. Times’?

 

Seven years after selling Times Mirror Co., owner of the Los Angeles Times, the Chandler family might get it back as part of a shrewd bid that could give it control of the entire Tribune Co. for less than the selling price of one of the nation’s most acclaimed newspaper companies.

 

Already Tribune’s largest shareholder, the family has offered to buy the media titan and spin-off its broadcast division in a deal valued at $7.6 billion.

 

In 2000, the Chandlers sold Times Mirror to Tribune for $8 billion, including debt.

 

The current bid reflects the changing strategy of the family that built Times Mirror and helped shape Southern California while weathering its share of internal disputes.

 

The family made its offer for Tribune this week through Chandler Trusts, which has a 20 percent stake in Tribune and three board seats.

 

Last year, the family began to agitate for aggressive measures to boost Tribune’s sagging stock. The family publicly rejected a plan proposed by Tribune CEO Dennis FitzSimons that included share buybacks and instead called for the company’s breakup.

 

The showdown led the Tribune board to consider the sale of all or parts of the company.

 

Under its offer, Chandler Trusts, which represents about 170 family members, would own 51 percent of Tribune after the deal closes, with the remaining 49 percent held by two private equity firms, whose names were not disclosed.

 

The deal left observers unclear about the trusts’ intentions for the newspapers.

 

Tribune also received a joint bid from Los Angeles billionaires Eli Broad and Ronald Burkle that would pile significantly more debt, and risk, on Tribune at a time when the newspaper industry’s prospects are cloudy at best.

 

An independent Tribune board committee is expected to consider the offers Saturday in Chicago, with the full board deciding a course of action sometime in the first quarter.

 

Chandler family members on the Tribune board will not participate in the initial review.

 

The three seats are held by Jeffrey Chandler, 64, a cousin of storied Times publisher Otis Chandler, and Roger Goodan, whose mother was a Chandler. Trustee William Stinehart Jr. is an attorney who married into the family.

 

A biography on Tribune’s Web site says Jeffrey Chandler is president and chief executive officer of Chandler Ranch Co., a large grower of avocados in California. He once owned several radio stations in San Diego County.

 

An e-mail sent to Thomas Unterman, a Chandler Trusts attorney and longtime family adviser, was not immediately answered.

 

Only a few Chandler descendants have ever worked at a newspaper. Most draw an income from the trusts or vast real estate holdings bought with their Times Mirror fortune.

 

Rarely have family members publicly expressed concern for the journalistic integrity of the Times, which has been a revolving door for publishers and editors since Tribune took over.

 

David Laventhol, who served as Times publisher from 1989 to 1994, has bemoaned the decline of the company since the departure of Otis Chandler two decades ago.

 

During those years, Times Mirror sold off holdings, including magazines and cable TV companies.

 

“They wanted their money,” Laventhol told the Times last March about the family’s desire for dividends.

 

A festering feud between two family factions also complicated the running of Times Mirror and contributed to the decision to sell the company to Tribune in 2000.

 

The bad feelings began in 1960 when Norman Chandler snubbed his brother Philip and named his own son Otis as publisher.

 

Otis promptly alienated his relatives by shifting the paper’s conservative political stance to the left. He also started an editorial campaign against the right-wing John Birch Society, a group that counted Philip Chandler as one of its strongest supporters.

 

“The avaricious Chandlers for the next quarter century bit their tongues while Otis built the newspaper into one of the most powerful in the country, both from a circulation and advertising revenue side as well as journalistically,” said Dennis McDougal, a former Times staffer and author of the book “Privileged Son,” about Otis Chandler.

 

In 1980, Otis retired and over the next two decades, other family members asserted themselves.

 

The split became deeper in 1996, after Otis called his relatives “elitists” in a Vanity Fair article. Soon after, Otis left the governing board of the family trust, losing any voice in the future of the company.

 

When the family decided to sell Times Mirror to Tribune, Otis was notified only after the deal had been signed.

 

https://archive.is/4nKJh#selection-689.0-801.129