Anyone recall Steve Moore's comments on immigration? He said chain migration is a myth, along with a number of other things.
https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/cutting-immigration-myths-down-size
Sounds like the perfect establishment guy to nominate to the Fed, doesn't he?
"more has been done than ever before".
What has been done?
I've seen plenty of establishment proxies appointed, but we could've had that with another Bush, including naming CFR members to courts and influential exec branch positions.
Who's keeping that list?
Do you typically assume Heritage Foundation lickspittles to be dangerous to 'the cabal'? How about sychophantic Bushies? This sh*t bothers me. It's in our face. One after another. No one flinches.
https://www.amazon.com/Bullish-Bush-Owenership-Society-Stronger/dp/1568332610
"In a spirited and compelling fashion, Bullish on Bush sets the record straight on the stunning success of President Bush's tax cut policies. It also provides the first comprehensive analysis of George W. Bush's bold second term economic agenda to create a broad-based Ownership Society in America and explains how Bush's tax relief policies have helped the economy grow, reversed the collapse in the stock market, and put America back to work. This book will make you Bullish on Bush, and Bullish on America!"
Right. Still no explanations of why so many 'enemies' are installed into positions of influence. Just selective attention.
I'll let you get back to your 'important' Rachel Chandler work.
It's shocking how sadly herdlike this place is now. Zero attention to anything outside the approved narrative. Childish dismissals of significant appointments of establishment pawns (and so many neocons) as some kind of clever tactic yet to yield any rewards. But soon.
I'm sure Venezuelans are happy to hear you think POTUS supporting CIA regime change ops is disingenuous, while they figure their way through blackouts and absurd attempts to install proxies by fiat. But votes count, right?
'We're the news' would require people to challenge those in power. This place has too many fanboys to have any ethical integrity. Just more 'but 4D chess' nonsense, while it gets stuck in our faces.
Oh, and we're "leaving (some nation) for last". Great con. I suppose we have to coddle our enemies and their pawns before we attack them head on.
Unbelievable.
Bolton is 'controlled'? Like how he circumvented a peace negotiation? You think he'll be blamed and POTUS won't? Absurdity on all fronts.
You don't appoint your foes to positions of influence. You sideline them and rescind their clearances.
Since NSA has been choking down petabytes for years, there should be plenty of 'dirt' to use against them. No need to put them all around you.
But….that doesn't sit well with folks bending over backwards to explain away the inconvenient choices, does it?
Come on. You think people aren't keen to this place and the things stated here? Of course they are. It's as readily available to them as to you or me. If you think POTUS is moving on them, they do, too. You think they don't have contacts who can fill them in on anything they want to know? How do you think elites got so powerful? By being trusting morons? WTF?
And no, you don't willingly surround yourself with enemies. You sideline them and revoke their clearances. You don't need evidence of new crimes and gossip. 'We have it all", remember?
It's such a Luddite attitude to keep pretending these things don't matter, that they're part of a 'bigger plan', because we were told so by someone we don't know. Listen to us. We sound moronic.
'Trust the plan' does not imply the plan should be Helping the enemy. Telling dullards Murdoch Fox is our friend is nothing but damaging. Pretending 'we're the news', when there's zero objectivity and sychophantic adoration of a politician behind every comment is just childish, self-serving nonsense.
We're supposed to challenge power, no be co-opted by it, yet again.