Anonymous ID: 6ac7e5 March 22, 2019, 12:01 p.m. No.5829095   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5829037

TY Baker!!!

 

Mr Woods:

https://twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/status/1109167908221931520

 

The way to end every discussion with every looney liberal on Twitter: when they use the word “racist,” retweet with “#yawn,” every single instance without exception. If every rational person does this, that’ll be one more Alinsky tactic down the drain. It’ll get old very quickly.

Anonymous ID: 6ac7e5 March 22, 2019, 12:11 p.m. No.5829221   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9698

>>5829190

Yes. Not sure how the "old white male" is going to manage to rally the base. I know Biden isn't even trusted by many dems, and he's creepy as fuck all. Hickenlooper has a lot of fans in CO, though. They instituted that magazine size ban, and outlawed actual private sales.

https://lawcenter.giffords.org/private-sales-in-colorado/

Anonymous ID: 6ac7e5 March 22, 2019, 12:19 p.m. No.5829326   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5829270

The conference went three days, IIRC. The Dems pushing for it repeatedly stated "it is not a tax" when referring to the mandate fine. On the last day, and after a SHIT TON of coaching from Roberts about "is this a tax?", the Dems finally caved and called it a tax. Then it passed. The interpretive constitutionality of it being a "fine" vs a "tax" is clear. Feds cannot imposed undue fines on individuals for not purchasing a "service", but they can impose a "tax", as that is a power granted by the constitution.

 

The Supreme Court, in an opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, upheld by a vote of 5 to 4 the individual mandate to buy health insurance as a constitutional exercise of Congress's taxing power. A majority of the justices, including Chief Justice Roberts, agreed that the individual mandate was not a proper use of Congress's Commerce Clause or Necessary and Proper Clause powers, though they did not join in a single opinion. A majority of the justices also agreed that another challenged provision of the Act, a significant expansion of Medicaid, was not a valid exercise of Congress's spending power as it would coerce states to either accept the expansion or risk losing existing Medicaid funding.