>>5828845 (pb)
Besides what Q is doing, this is what we need to be doing, shining a light on all of the sick, pedo fucks! Rats prefer operating in the dark. Wake up the normies to the scum they put on a pedestal!
YOU ARE FULL OF SHIT! Discrediting the anons who work hard by digging, meme making and twatting everyday? I don't think so. There are plenty of non-bot anons on here! Go back to Tel Aviv, you fucking kike! You can fuck right off with your nigger shit!
I'm calling bullshit on the new narrative I've seen on here a few times that Comey is "our guy." First off, he's the one that signed the first Fisa warrant, he's the one who leaked the memo through the college professor that went to the press and resulted in the appointment of Robert Mueller, and he's the one who admitted in testimony before Congress, that the purpose in leaking the memo was to get the special; counsel appointed. Besides the history lesson that illustrates he's one of the biggest haters of the bunch against GEOTUS, Q has said repeatedly, no deals! They have enough on Comey, and all of his cohorts, that he really is of no use in terms of deal making, and he knows it! Why do you think he works so hard in constantly trying to stay ahead of the curve and try to absolve himself of wrongdoing in the court of public opinion? The bottom line, he's not "our guy," and never will be!
A law that is unconstitutional needs to be fought and resisted by any and all means necessary! We aren't New Zealand pussies here, and we will fight this travesty, if it passes into law!
Marketplace of ideas and Freedom of Speech 1
Total bullshit! Hate speech is protected speech, under the First Amendment! They didn't write the First Amendment so that only speech "agreeable" to everyone, is protected! Rather, that was the point of protecting the speech of those with diametrically opposed views.
The USSC has set forth the concept of "The marketplace of ideas," in many of their opinions.
The marketplace of ideas refers to the belief that the test of the truth or acceptance of ideas depends on their competition with one another and not on the opinion of a censor, whether one provided by the government or by some other authority.
Marketplace of Ideas
By David Schultz (Updated June 2017 by David L. Hudson)
John Stuart Mill's writings in On Liberty, published in 1859, is thought to be the origin of translating market competition into a theory of free speech. Mill argues against censorship and in favor of the free flow of ideas. Asserting that no alone knows the truth, or that no one idea alone embodies either the truth or its antithesis, or that truth left untested will slip into dogma, Mill claims that the free competition of ideas is the best way to separate falsehoods from fact. (Photo of John Stuart Mill circa 1870 by the London Stereoscopic Company, public domain)
The marketplace of ideas refers to the belief that the test of the truth or acceptance of ideas depends on their competition with one another and not on the opinion of a censor, whether one provided by the government or by some other authority.
Concept is economic analogy
This concept draws on an analogy to the economic marketplace, where, it is claimed, through economic competition superior products sell better than others. Thus, the economic marketplace uses competition to determine winners and losers, whereas the marketplace of ideas uses competition to judge truth and acceptability. This theory of speech therefore condemns censorship and encourages the free flow of ideas as a way of viewing the First Amendment.
John Stuart Mill originated concept
Perhaps the origins of translating market competition into a theory of free speech was John Stuart Mill’s 1859 publication On Liberty. In Chapter 2, Mill argues against censorship and in favor of the free flow of ideas. Asserting that no one alone knows the truth, or that no one idea alone embodies either the truth or its antithesis, or that truth left untested will slip into dogma, Mill claims that the free competition of ideas is the best way to separate falsehoods from fact.
Court has invoked the marketplace concept as a theory of free expression
The first reference to the marketplace of ideas was by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. in Abrams v. United States (1919). Dissenting from a majority ruling that upheld the prosecution of an anarchist for his anti-war views under the Espionage Act of 1917, Holmes stated: “But when men have realized that time has upset many fighting faiths, they may come to believe even more than they believe the very foundations of their own conduct that the ultimate good desired is better reached by free trade in ideas — that the best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market, and that truth is the only ground upon which their wishes safely can be carried out.”
Marketplace of ideas and Freedom of Speech 2
Since this first appeal to the marketplace of ideas as a theory of free expression, it has been invoked hundreds if not thousands of times by the Supreme Court and federal judges to oppose censorship and to encourage freedom of thought and expression. The Court invoked the phrase in McCreary County v. American Civil Liberties Union (2005) to strike down a religious display of the Ten Commandments in front of a courthouse, in Randall v. Sorrell (2006) to invalidate expenditure limits for candidates for political office, and in Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union (1997) to bar enforcement of the Communications Decency Act in censoring the content of material distributed on the Internet and the Web.
More recently, the Court invoked the phrase several times in Matal v. Tam (2017), the decision invalidating a provision of federal trademark law that prohibited disparaging trademarks. Both Justice Samuel Alito in his majority opinion and Justice Anthony Kennedy in his concurring opinion referenced the marketplace of ideas.
The Court used the phrase in Walker v. Sons of Confederate Veterans (2015), explaining that “government statements do not normally trigger the First Amendment rules designed to protect the marketplace of ideas.”
Justice Stephen Breyer also invoked the metaphor in his concurring opinion in Reed v . Town of Gilbert (2015), writing that “whenever government disfavors one kind of speech, it places that speech at a disadvantage, potentially interfering with the free marketplace of ideas and with an individual’s ability to express thoughts and ideas that can help that individual determine the kind of society in which he wishes to live, help shape that society, and help define his place within it.”
Overall, the marketplace of ideas analogy has become a powerful idea, underpinning much of First Amendment jurisprudence. It remains perhaps the most pervasive metaphor to justify broad protections for free speech.
Sauce-https://www. mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/999/marketplace-of-ideas