Anonymous ID: 4a21ff March 7, 2018, 5:29 p.m. No.583312   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>583273

 

Yeah, that's ok.. It's only taken 4 bread for all of the so-called "experienced" anons to forget.

 

The only individuals that would be concerned enough to removed them would be clowns masquerading as legit users..

Anonymous ID: 4a21ff March 7, 2018, 5:30 p.m. No.583327   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>3431

These recent findings concerning the clowns and the bots are being posted in light of the heavy traffic we've been getting. This is more for new visitors, so they don't get suckered into wasting their time. Hardened anons already know all this shit:

 

How to Spot a Clown:

 

– Attempting to get a divisive or emotional knee-jerk trigger response from (you) to derail research is a red flag.

– Concern trolling and copy/pasta spam shilling that contradicts confirmed findings is another red flag.

– Using faux debate tactics: Generalizations, gas-lighting, misdirection, false equivalences, confusing correlation with causality, appeal to authority, transference, false precepts, personal attacks, straw-men, red herrings, etc. are all yet another red flag.

– Employing social ethics that are disingenuous, such as doxxing anyone, "reverse psychology" ploys or ones based on lying to the American People; These are obvious red flags.

– Promoting tactics that are unethical, illegal or involve violence outside the scope of the Law are huge red flags.

– Using Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt tactics for any reason is highly suspicious.

 

This is just a subset of the disinformation tactics employed. A complete write-up is available here: https:// vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/the-25-rules-of-disinformation/

Anonymous ID: 4a21ff March 7, 2018, 5:30 p.m. No.583331   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>3431

How to spot a Clown's bot

 

– It seems that the easiest way to get a bot wrangler to give their (you) to you is to fuck with the bots by proxy, either by copy/pasting the user's ID as a quoted reference instead of tagging its actual post link in your response, or by answering it with text in an image (or both) until they start fucking up because they can't lock onto a target phrase correctly.. Doing this can also make the bots look artificially erratic, and easier for other anons to spot. It also makes it so the wranglers HAVE TO engage.

– NEVER KNOWINGLY ENGAGE A BOT DIRECTLY. It just wastes bread with their responses, and hands the bot a target to lock on to. If you suspect a bot is trying to engage (you), the countermeasures will force the wrangler to earn it, which usually outs them; They are lazy.

 

Most of the tells in the graphic still apply. For example: The wranglers still can't meme.

 

(((They))) are playing for keeps; This isn't a game.