Anonymous ID: 9b347c March 22, 2019, 8:21 p.m. No.5838414   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8436

>>5838322 (LB)

So, what you're saying is now that it's pretty clear that his investigation actually

exonerates Trump, the left/DS can go ahead and say it's invalid because the

guy doing the investigation was dirty as fuck. I guess now we have to start

over because Trump fucked up by putting a criminal in charge of his

exoneration. Damn.

 

I swear you people simply don't think.

Anonymous ID: 9b347c March 22, 2019, 8:25 p.m. No.5838541   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8603

>>5838436

No shit sherlock. Are you truly that incapable of seeing WHY that was true?

 

SMDH. All they would have to do now is drop all that evidence of the crimes

Mueller supposedly commited, while (((they))) were in charge to invalidate every bit of that. This isn't rocket science.

Anonymous ID: 9b347c March 22, 2019, 8:29 p.m. No.5838644   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8773

>>5838603

Seriously? Are you that fucking stupid? Do you understand how "comping" somebody

works? You people are like retarded children that never paid attention to politics before,

because you were too stupid to understand it in the first place. Now is your time in the sun to shine and what do we get? Proof that

you were too stupid to understand it in the first place.

Anonymous ID: 9b347c March 22, 2019, 8:35 p.m. No.5838794   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5838742

I'd argue unlikely only because it runs the risk of jeopardizing his

investigation of Trump if the media finds out he was secretly dropping

hints to a large group of anonymous conspiracy theorists (face it,

that's what we are in their minds).