We have been voluntarily inducted into a coordinated movement that includes POTUS, MI, NSA, etc.

Q interfaces with the willing on the research board and keeps a one-way board (Great Awakening).

We have been tasked with researching and posting the connection between the crumbs dropped by Q and spreading the result of the crumbs and the hive mind research to the general public. In fact, Q has told us the format by which we can most effectively complete that task.

I refer anons to two (2) Q posts specifically:

1. 1.13.2018 @ 23.28.37

SIDE-BY-SIDE Posts vs Actual News

SHOW: FUTURE PROVES PAST

BIGGER next week

Q

1. 1.14.2018 @ 00.28.29

Side_by_Side (graphic form):

BDT/False Flag posts vs actual news

DEFCON 1 posts v H scare_

[2] above represent PRIMARY indicators.

SEC indicators = Posts:Tweets:Time

REMAINDER below

START HERE

WILL GUIDE

Q

In these two posts, Q has given us a template, what Q calls the (graphic form). I assume the Q team believe by using this format we will be most effective at achieving our task (waking up the general public from their SLEEP and DIVISION).

Further, in the second post he differentiates the graphic format into what he calls indicators.

Q gives us two (2) PRIMARY indicators.

Q also draws distinction to SEC indicators (of which we had 2 today). Regarding SEC indicators Q states that SEC indicators = Posts:Tweets:Time.

Lastly he refers to REMAINDER below.

For this anon and the many becoming anon everyday I request that a more enlightened anon(s) to explain the following:

What is the role of the PRIMARY indicators?

What is an anon to do once they recognize these indicators?

What is meant by SEC indicators = Posts:Tweets:Time?

What is the meaning and application of the REMAINDER?

Although I may have read these posts incorrectly, together they both specifically give anon the keys to create the most effective infobombs possible.

Please clarify and advise

>>584034

Interesting. If so, what does it mean in this context 'eliminate L-6 (44/Hussein)?

What question is JA attempting to answer that he needs to eliminate 44 from the possible responses?

>>584033

So our task is to put the warning we received from Q out there preemptively and that might compromise the operation altogether?

I assume if many people have seen the warning ahead of time and ignored the warning, they are going to want to re-examine the warning after a real incident occurs. Upon reexamination they will come to the conclusion that someone tried to warn them. That someone (an anon) will most certainly listened to from that point forward.

>>584234

I think they are testing emergency protocols and looking for an opportunity to flee.

Continue to threaten without result eventually leads to more lax security.

>>584510

Maybe we will just pay attention to the documents that Congress releases after they receive the Fast & Furious rather than reading an article that attempts to make F/F relative to something else.