Anonymous ID: 81b1dc March 7, 2018, 6:53 p.m. No.584227   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4253

>>584086

And you propose doing thisโ€ฆ how, exactly?

You're gonna get on Tucker Carlson's show and do a piece on Q?

Maybe start up a YouTube channel and famefag harder than Baruch or Pamphlet?

Perhaps you'd like to join Tracy and Corsi and every other attention-seeking brainlet and start the dialogue yourself?

Go on, fuckwit, be our guest. You'll be the laughing stock of the planet and your message will go nowhere.

Be honest - the public at large is not fully prepared for this precious dialogue you're seeking. Not yet, anyway.

The only way to get them there is to start with the basics, the familiar, the easy-to-digest.

We're here to do that the way the works best - hashtags and meme magic.

Instead you're harping on about a "dialogue" like a fucking faggot.

Kill yourself, quickly.

Anonymous ID: 81b1dc March 7, 2018, 7:17 p.m. No.584512   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4563 >>4764

>>584209

>We need to try and organize this initiative.

No we do not, you soy-chugging mongoloid.

>I am not entirely sure how to do this

PRECISELY. No one here is equipped to do that shit.

The folks in charge - DJT/Q/MI - are equipped for it and are paying attention to the ideas the stick in the public consciousness.

They understand that this is meant to be done by and for normies.

We treat normies like scum and have the combined social grace of a rabid golden retriever.

We're already volunteering to do what we're good at: getting the word out.

We are not here to "have a dialogue" like some kum-ba-yah faggot sewing circle.

We're here to spread information and make meme magic happen, such that others can continue the dialogue without us going autistic in public and fucking it up.