>>5846574

how fitting, using a living thing as a prop.

when I see a manly person holding a big fish, I think 'that's fine' becuase they usually do a catch and release. She is rather far from the lake to be putting the fish back in the water.

And not having it on ice means that it's not going to last that long. I hope that they grill it and eat it quickly, or it's just a senseless waste of life. But they are all about simbolism, so they don't see it as a creature of god that they are using as a prop.

how judgmental of me. Maybe she really is going to eat it. Or maybe the lake or stream is right there, and she's just about to release ti back into the pond.

>>5846677

I've read the book of Enoch, even though it was removed.

and they 'tell us' about 'them' in there so, I disagree. Those who had ears to hear heard.

>>5846520

these discussions always lead to those who make them being ridculed and sometimes, the meanness of peole means that anyone who responds to them, as well, gets deleted from the bread. I've seen it.

Jesus made a new Covenent.

Rossevelt made a 'new deal', which was essentially just legitimize the surf-class slavewagers who weren't in the family so they would subsist and not revolt.

>>5846363

as a citizen and that's a foreign policy decision I will defer to our president for a decision in that regard.

He's the head of our foreign policy.