Anonymous ID: e647a4 March 7, 2018, 10:08 p.m. No.585929   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5949 >>5992

>>585875

I was also very suspicious when the "liddle" fiasco occurred.

In BO's defense he owned up to and corrected it.

It's concerning that he didn't forsee the potential impact it could have had if Q wanted to post and use the word "little", but he seems to have learned from it and as far as I know, does operate pretty transparently. He doesn't seem to delete. If he bans, he leaves the posts and states why they are banned. And I can personally vouche that if you make a fair appeal to a ban, he will consider it.

He responded to my critism about BV in a fairly reasonable way.

 

We're here because we're anons and we really do question everything. It's in our nature and what makes us good for this mission. We keep each other in check.

 

I personally am going to give him the benefit of the doubt and return to the mission.

 

WWG1WGA