Is this the missing link between Ray Chandler and Michal Chelbin?

So Michal Chelbin has an "interesting" follower on IG, "sarah.akrav". '''She did the "casting" for some of Michal's photoshoots. see attached.

So who is "@sarah.akrav"?

she is Sarah Benjamin.

"Sarah Benjamin moved to New York in 2013 from her home city of Jerusalem. With her she brought the perspective of an artist, developed independently from the norms and expectations of the creative industry. Without any personal connections or traditional guidance she built a career through her individualistic eye and keen understanding of people and places."

https://www.streeters.com/artists/casting/akrav-by-sarah-benjamin/portfolio

There are no hebrew resources about this woman. which is strange at the very least, given her "status" in NY.

here is a piece that was made on this agency.

http://officemagazine.net/brooklyn-sarah-benjamin

and here is the website of the agency:

akrav meaning scorpion, in hebrew.

https://www.akravagency.com/board/

look at the models, they look like trafficked drug addicts. Also notice the generic fake "names".(see attached), and the "model" that is missing a tooth.

Akrav is also connected to "streeters" agency, since Akrav is a subgroup of "Streeters"

Streeters is a global creative talent agency representing leading artists in the beauty and fashion industries.

The agency was founded in London in 1988 and opened a US division in 1994. From the beginning, the company focus has been on managing and developing talent in the fields of Photography, Makeup, Hair Styling, Fashion Styling, Set Design, Casting, Sound Design, Choreography, Art Direction, Costume, and Colour Creative Direction.

Streeters is a Great Bowery company.

https://www.streeters.com/about

'''what is great bowery?

Founded in 2015, Great Bowery brings together the leading agencies in the fashion and luxury image making industries, uniting seasoned executives and iconic talent including photographers, directors, stylists, hair & make-up artists, creative directors, illustrators, set designers and other related creatives. At the core of this collective is an unwavering focus on talent and on powerful and exceptional creative work.

Agencies under the Great Bowery umbrella include CLM, Streeters, M.A.P, Bernstein & Andriulli, Wenzel & Co., Trunk Archive, and Gallery Stock. Great Bowery is headquartered in the iconic 1898 Germania Bank building on the Bowery in New York City. European headquarters are in London with additional offices in Paris, Munich, and Sydney.

https://www.greatbowery.com/about

everything surrounding this smells fishy, to me it looks like the whole "casting agency" and "models" is a cover for something more sinister. Given her background, MOS can be involved (honeypots, standard hotel, etc). These people don't look like models, and there are way too many coincidences surrounding it.

Something about the akrav - Chelbin connection is way off.

attached is another shady photo from their book.

more shady stuff can be found on

https://www.streeters.com/artists/casting/akrav-by-sarah-benjamin/

need more eyes on this, there is plenty dig material here.

>>5854966

<tireless dedication

if they'll pay you enough you will also be dedicated too, that is if your second job option is McDonald.

>>5855020

generalization are wrong and play to their social engineering. It is about corrupt individuals, not about groups of sheep. The ruling class wants you to think it is the sheep next door, while they laugh at you both.

>>5855166

It is an endlessly pushed, fake and gay shill garbage.

this link debunks all the shill garbage:

http://talmud.faithweb.com/

oh wait, what's this? all that garbage is taken from the "book" called "talmud unmasked"!

>talmud unmasked, a book published in 1892 by Justinas Bonaventure Pranaitis (1861–1917).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Talmud_Unmasked

The author is the same clown that was exposed as a complete fraud in the Beilis trial.

He was brought over as an "expert", and got completely exposed as a fraud:

>One prosecution witness, presented as a religious expert in Judaic rituals, was a Catholic priest, Justinas Pranaitis from Tashkent, well known for his antisemitic 1892 work Talmud Unmasked. Pranaitis testified that the murder of Yushchinsky was a religious ritual, associating the murder of Yushchinsky with the blood libel, a legend believed by many Russians at the time.

>Pranaitis' credibility rapidly evaporated when the defense demonstrated his ignorance of some simple Talmudic concepts and definitions, such as hullin,[1]:p.215 to the point where "many in the audience occasionally laughed out loud when he clearly became confused and couldn't even intelligibly answer some of the questions asked by my lawyer."[3]

>A Beilis Defense Committee advisor, a writer named Ben-Zion Katz, suggested countering Father Pranaitis with questions like "When did Baba Bathra live and what was her activity" which he described as the equivalent of asking an American "Who lived at the Gettysburg Address?" There were enough Jews in the court for the resultant laughter to negate Pranatis' value to the prosecution.[1]:pp.214-216

KEK!

>A Tsarist secret police agent is quoted, reporting on Pranaitis' testimony, as saying: Cross-examination of Pranaitis has weakened evidentiary value of his expert opinion, exposing lack of knowledge of texts, insufficient knowledge of Jewish literature. Because of amateurish knowledge and lack of resourcefulness, Pranaitis' expert opinion is of very low value.

KEK!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menahem_Mendel_Beilis

oh and here is more:

>The identification of Yeshu as Jesus is problematic. For example, the Talmud mentions Yeshu ben Pandera/ben Stada's stepfather, Pappos ben Yehuda, speaking with Rabbi Akiva,[3] who was executed at the climax of the Bar Kokhba revolt in 135 CE.[4][5] Furthermore, Yeshu the Pharisee student is described as being a student of the second-century BCE nasi Joshua ben Perachiah, as well as being among the exiled Pharisees returning to Israel following their persecution[6][7] by John Hyrcanus,[8], an event which occurred in 74 BC. Additionally, Yeshu the sorcerer was executed by the royal government which lost legal authority in 63 BC. These events would place the lifetime of either Yeshu decades before or after the birth and death of Jesus.[9][10] Still, there are numerous other passages pertaining to an individual named "Yeshu" that either don't provide a specific time period or else specify a time where it is reasonable to assume mentioning of Jesus would even be possible (take for example a notable passage, Gittin 57a mentioning the nobleman Onkelos conjuring the tormented spirit of "Yeshu" – Onkelos lived more than a century after Jesus, thus making it possible the Yeshu mentioned could indeed be Jesus, though the likelihood of this is still questionable) still opening the possibility that whichever Yeshu mentioned might be Jesus. '

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_in_the_Talmud

let the shill kvetching begin!

>>5855002

It is a fabricated hoax. Replace "jews" with the "ruling class" and then you will have the real deal. It is a forgery that took a lot from a similar piece written in Napoleon's time.

>>5855278

the "book" presents the same bullshit that was written in the 19s century in "talmud unmasked".

so kvetch harder around this:

>>5855213

>>5855005

>>5855276

<we

who is we?

maybe if you will actually study instead of ip hopping and shilling for pennies you'll have a future.

>>5855352

>>5855382

>>5855372

<mossad

the muhjew shill scripts

script #1:

while(1) {

print "goy, kike, moshe, schlomo, rabbi, foreskin";

wait_for_reply();

if(reply == high_iq) { $myreply = "pilpul";}

else {$myreply = "jidf, ADL, what time is it in tel-aviv";}

echo $myreply;

}

<muh talmud

learn about the jewish medieval history clown. How the jews were used by the "good christian" Rulers as scape goats and as frotmen for their loan businesses.

I bet this guy in paris was unbiased.

keep on kvetching. try to debunk a single claim written here:

>>5855213

>>5855326

>>5855002

Elements of the Protocols were plagiarized from Joly's fictional Dialogue in Hell, a thinly veiled attack on the political ambitions of Napoleon III, who, represented by the non-Jewish character Machiavelli,[18] plots to rule the world. Joly, a monarchist and legitimist, was imprisoned in France for 15 months as a direct result of his book's publication. Scholars have noted the irony that Dialogue in Hell was itself a plagiarism, at least in part, of a novel by Eugène Sue, Les Mystères du Peuple (1849–56).[19]

Identifiable phrases from Joly constitute 4% of the first half of the first edition, and 12% of the second half; later editions, including most translations, have longer quotes from Joly.[20]

The Protocols 1–19 closely follow the order of Maurice Joly's Dialogues 1–17. For example:

>>5855488

>>5855459

>>5855400

>>5855504

another ip hop? and for this shit?! you don't have a clue about the talmud.

read:

>>5855213

>>5855505

<copy pasta