Anonymous ID: 197583 March 23, 2019, 6:56 p.m. No.5856055   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6071 >>6127 >>6192

ok it was kind of covered yesterday when I saw it but an anon linked all-in-studio.com. It has the same woman from rachelchandler.us with the sunglasses on it. they linked to the studio's instagram @allinstudio. Someone commented or liked one of their photos @another__kind . from @another__kind it lead to many accounts because that account curates this kind of pedovore shit. that is how i found @death_book. Now usually there is a big human trafficky satanic vibe with the instagrams @death_book actually is that plus using children in their art. Very disturbing.

Anonymous ID: 197583 March 23, 2019, 7:08 p.m. No.5856272   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6353

>>5856192

but the biggest proof is the picture they posted of brook sheilds as a child. I clicked on the hashtag #richardprince and found a tidbit on the picture:

 

Brooke Shields was only 10 years old when her mother gave the photographer Garry Gross permission to photograph her naked, face made up, in a bathtub. The images were taken in 1975 for a Playboy publication called Sugar and Spice. Shields was paid $450.

The photograph was later reappropriated by the artist Richard Prince, who photographed the original image. He included it in a show at London’s Tate Modern. It was removed from the exhibition after Scotland Yard suggested it might break obscenity laws.

The one fan of the image? Richard Prince, who described the image as “a body with two different sexes, maybe more, and a head that looks like it’s got a different birthday.”

The photographer Collier Schorr avows the photo was hanging in the hallway of the artist’s studio in the ‘80s, when she was its subletter.

“I always thought that it was a perverse picture,” Schorr told the Guardian in 2009. “I found it really disturbing, but my impression always was that Richard made the piece because it was disturbing … It tells you everything about what we fear and desire.”

Shields’ mother Teri sued Gross in 1981, stating that he was profiting off of the continual resale of the image and it was damaging the actor’s reputation. However, she appeared in Louis Malle’s Pretty Baby in 1978, which includes a scene in which her virginity is auctioned. The judge ruled in Gross’ favor, saying that the images “have no erotic appeal except to possibly perverse minds.”

 

why would they post the picture of brook sheilds as a child on a fucking ritzy art magazine blog