Anonymous ID: 88db90 March 23, 2019, 8:18 p.m. No.5857423   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7429 >>7438 >>7440 >>7444 >>7445 >>7448 >>7451 >>7453 >>7456 >>7459 >>7467 >>7472 >>7484 >>7487 >>7489 >>7490 >>7519 >>7549 >>7720 >>7760 >>7773 >>7850 >>7883 >>7944

I'm a little late for this announcement but we have noticed anons discussion and use of global notables as "extra notable" notables. Global notables should be reserved for meta issues as they used to be. CM announcements, board staff announcements, board related issues, things like that. It seems like we have people trying to push their notables for global just to get more exposure over others. This is not what we want.

 

On that note, I'm very far behind on updating the notables and qposts pages and I apologize for that. I will be working on those now.

 

Beware groups who would try to engage in consensus cracking by pushing their notables for global as if they are so much more important than yours. All notables are important.

Anonymous ID: 88db90 March 23, 2019, 8:38 p.m. No.5857706   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7713 >>7728 >>7732 >>7743 >>7775 >>7781 >>7864 >>7898

>>5857562

At the time, we had a bunch of regular bakers with no new bakers willing to step up to bat, possibly intimidated by the checks, maybe not, but it looks like no one really cared anymore as everyone was able to identify eachother via syntax and familiar images on handoff. With the influx of new bakers coming in and the whole baker assist retardation shitting up the breads, I might have to start making that happen again. Not right away though, I'll think about it.