Why are you here?
You could bake if you wanted, anyone is allowed to bake.
Instead you do this fucking BakerAssItch bullshit, and abuse bakers that try to keep the ship on course.
FFS BO himself fucking called your shit out as faggotry, and a chorus of Anons agreed, and yet you keep going.
Either contribute in ways Anons want, or GTFO.
This isn't your personal jackoff machine.
Because we have to look out for subtle shill ops, and this was looking to maybe be one. Chan culture self-corrects by aggressive calling out of stuff that starts pulling the culture or procedures off course.
>"too many cooks"
^^^This^^^
And this history is correct:
This "anon" didn't take anon feedback and adjust, but continued to push an agenda. We should always be suspect of such behavior.
>Bakers ASK for people to call out, nominate notables. Even to collect sometimes.
Yes, but this an occasional, natural thing. This faggot was trying to create another unique position, and a namefagged one at that, in the "BA" or BakerAssist role. He and others were also trying to retcon that position as one that had always existed.
>The issue, and why BO chimed in, is that someone kept pushing their own notables, and talking shit about bakering.
Two separate issues: the Globals issue and then the BakerAssItch issue.
When anons start devolving into arguing what is or isn't the basic structure of how we run bakering, BO will often step in and make the call so we can all move fwd. He's very conservative with that function, which is good. We're largely self-run and that's how we like it. But BO knows when enough's enough.
KEK!!!
Yeah, he's good at those.
>like your opinion mean's dick to me.
I think it's you who needs to take stock of the fact that your opinions means less than a bag of limp dicks to anons here.
You're embarrassing yourself.
Stahp.
But those are cookie versions of erect, functional dicks.
Your dick is limp and ineffectual.
Reconcile.