>>5861679

When the president supports gun confiscations, and shills like you say everything is going to according to plan, anons tend to get nervous because what you're saying and reality don't match.

You can say the great awakening is the defense, but if the defense is supporting red flag gun laws, we're fucked.

>>5861714

>>5861714

The populace told to trust trump?

So now you're saying that trump puts out shitty policies so that people wake up to the shitty policies and demand change? Rather than Trump actually taking a moral stand against evil things?

And I'm the gaslighter? I'm just saying WHAT TRUMP IS DOING. And that's gaslighting?

What kind of comical retardation is that shit?

>Plus, your statements ignore DJT's track record. So you're being bright in ways that you aren't intending..

What have I said that's not true? Does Trump support bump stock ban?

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/18/us/politics/trump-bump-stocks-ban.html

Yes! (but pointing out reality is gaslighting)

Does Trump support red flag gun laws?

https://nationalgunrights.org/resources/news/white-house-endorses-red-flag-gun-confiscation/

Yes! (but me pointing it out is gaslighting?)

Can you come up with a non-retarded answer please?

>>5861814

>>5861814

Oh. You don't support the second amendment either.

Now it makes more sense why you say I'm gaslighting. Because you want gun control and don't believe in "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED".

And you call me the shill.

Fucking pathetic.