>>5860464 pb

>>5860488 pb

>It's the person and timing.

Which means that we should see numerous individual reactions in the video as there were numerous individual victims at various timings.

>>5860385 pb

>victims immediately fall to the floor like sacks of potatoes, face down

>>5862133

If there were secret indictments that were withdrawn as is alluded to:

>>5853545 pb Q

>(manufacted crimes of perjury)

then there is evidence to back it up (no matter how tenuous). The evidence (e.g. interview transcripts) is what they want.

In order to get it, they need to push the 'transparency' angle. Hence the call for the report.

If the report is as 'comprehensive' as is being reported, prolly means it was written by multiple people (e.g. Weissmann) and will most likely make allusions to this evidence without making any direct accusations (otherwise there would be more indictments).

Lawyers can be very sneaky with language if and when they want (see Comey).