You attack the second amendment and have the balls to say I'm a shill.
You deserve nothing better than a public execution.
Traitors justice.
Your day is coming. The rights will be restored, with you or through you.
How does he support states rights if he supports a FEDERAL BUMP STOCK BAN?
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/18/us/politics/trump-bump-stocks-ban.html
Can you explain that slowly? Or just going to ignore it?
How does he support the 2a if he supports STEALING PEOPLE'S WEAPONS BECAUSE SOMEONE SAID THEY'RE SCARED?
https://nationalgunrights.org/resources/news/white-house-endorses-red-flag-gun-confiscation/
How can you, with a straight face, claim that these are good and supportive of the 2a and states rights?
This is so dumb. Just defend it. You can't, so you'll ignore this and meme.
Fucking sad the state of people.
With you or through you.
Yeah. There are a lot of traitors, and they trigger me. 2A will be restored.
How about this: Random people should not be allowd to call the police, claim you're dangerous, and have the cops at your door stealing your guns without a trial first.
Too extreme?
STATES RIGHTS! BUT FEDERAL BANS!
And yes, it is still infringing on my rights. You're just fine with that because you're a fascist.
I'm a shill for defending my rights. The absolute state of this board. Fucking cucks. Seriously.
I neither own, nor want to own a bumpstock. But if you think that these laws STOP with bump stocks, where the fuck have you been for the last 200 years?
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.
Defending the constitution == shill
Attacking the constitution == true woke anon
Fucking retardedly transparent. You don't happen to be Mossad do you? You like to push for guns in your country while attacking American's rights. Weird that.
"It's a strawman to point out:
-
I want to ban bump stocks
-
Bump stocks are arms
-
That is against the 2nd amendment
Because I can't defend it legally I can only defend it by saying stupid shit"
What kind of argument is this? Seriously. Think for yourself and stop spewing Mossad propaganda.
Exactly. Kink shaming people for weapons is gross. Just agree, shall not be infringed.
LOL! "Does anyone think those Russians gave him money for no reason, no they thought he was a good investment!"
Said the guy funded to the tune of 20 million by Qatar.
"Look THERE not HERE".
Fucking water buffalo scumbag.
Not a shill, just honestly completely annoyed that even the "BEST" president for gun rights STILL wants to grab guns.
I agree Hilary would be worse. There's no doubt. But this just feels like a bit of deceleration rather than a reversal. And that's what I'm nervous about, especially since I already live in a place where things worse than bump stocks are allowed. So it's a real kick in the fucking nuts to watch POTUS attack guns in states with relatively liberal gun laws (e.g., bump stocks, red flag), while not attacking fucking NYC for blatantly unconstitutional laws.
He's attacking the wrong fucking side. I'm not sure why this is controversial?
So if the bumpstock comes stock it's legal?
What kind of stupid argument is that?
Arguing for your rights makes you a division shill.
Amazing.
What type of shill are you pray tell?
Oh fuck yes! That too! Don't even get me started on the "RED FLAG GUN LAWS (oh wait I already started that one)", "I smell marijuana", civil asset forfeiture, TSA, etc.
I have a lot of rage to go around.
Because the cops won't give me a permit because I live in a fascist city.
So some rights being take away is fine because it's procedural?
I don't get your point at all. Can you spell it out?
I don't see how arguing against the government being able to take away your guns because some citizen say so is ok?
I mean you do know 5 cops were shot in Houston because a drug dealer said there were drugs in this house, the cops went in and were shot by the owner? And it turned out the owner wasn't a drug dealer? And they killed the home owner?
Like. I don't understand how that isn't a procedural problem that got multiple people killed? Are you saying it's bad to defend my 4A rights in this case because "it's just procedural"?
I don't even get your point to be honest. Either you have principles and rights or you don't.
Sorry, forgot to mention this might also play a part:
https://www.range365.com/nj-court-says-man-cant-have-grandfathers-m1-carbine-back
But let's talk about banning bumpstocks. That's a good use of our time.
I wish I did.
I had to guns out of my parents house and move them to another state so we didn't get arrested.
I bring up the bump stock thing because not only will potus not talk about these things:
https://www.range365.com/nj-court-says-man-cant-have-grandfathers-m1-carbine-back
He will continue the ever continuing march to ensure we have more gun laws.
And people defend it because "it's not important".
No gun control is "important" in and of itself. But when you stack it up with red flag gun laws (which you keep ignoring for some reason), you realize your rights are STILL being taken away. Even by literally the best president in my life time.
I give him support. I just want it back. If he can't he can't. But I won't support him when he can't. That's what the enemy wants.
I didn't, sorry anon.
I'm not allowd to buy one. I have been considering buying an 80% lower since it's totally not a gun.
Division shill. Fight for the rights of all Americans. You know you're on the Q board right? Divided we are weak?
Keep us divided because you feel morally superior. Attack me for trying to change things.
That's how we'll win.
Sad. Forgive him Father, for he knows not what he says.
Total human anon. Praying for your soul and that you see the light and come to actually fight for America and Americans rather than whatever you're fighting for.
You do not understand what you're saying. And I hope when you learn, you will be able to forgive yourself.
I love you anon. But you're wrong to attack people who are trying. Divided we are weak. Together we are strong.