Anonymous ID: 2d5fc4 March 24, 2019, 8:32 a.m. No.5863050   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3077 >>3213

>>5862995

>This is not a slide -

''… but has anyone ever talked to you about [insert agenda item here]?"

 

If you can link it to persons or policies Q/POTUS has referenced, or that MSM is pushing, it's relevant info.

If you can't, it's a slide.

Anonymous ID: 2d5fc4 March 24, 2019, 8:42 a.m. No.5863174   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3208 >>3265 >>3279

>>5863078

Not notable IMO, baker.

Too spoopy and loosely connected to our purpose of political research. Just bc the MSM reports on something, doesn't mean it's of interest to us.

Good to post in-bread, bc anons getting hunches and spitballing often leads to more dots connecting that eventually become notable. But spitballs themselves aren't notable unless they directly comment on a recent Q drop IMO.

Anonymous ID: 2d5fc4 March 24, 2019, 8:56 a.m. No.5863356   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3383

>>5863265

Thanks for being open to anon feedback while still making your own decisions, baker. Good on ya.

 

>>5863208

Ty anon

>my instincts that it does have something to do with us waking up

See this is what makes it so spoopy, the "ascension" references, which is something Q has never mentioned. ELF, yes, but to something which has physical repercussions which can be measured.

 

>>5863279

Look FEtard, we're happy the info was posted, it just doesn't meet the standard of Notables. OP and baker agree, let it rest.