"This was began…nothing more, nothing less than a Clinton-Obama operation with a bunch of dirty cops at the FBI and career Justice Department officials that were all a part of it."

Anyone able to note the significance of this comment by Nunes?

"Nothing More, Nothing Less"…

Framing this as 'Clinton-Obama' and 'FBI-DOJ' - as opposed to what it was - a plot originating in SIS/CIA (same thing) - is dishonest. What's the motivation?

Going to try to pretend it's a domestic issue, only, and leave out all the trans-Atlantic fvckery?

Anyone see this being set up to bury the actual problem under bullsh*t about minions in FBI/DOJ being lone, "dirty cops"?

Not encouraging. Q propped this line by referencing it.

Explains why the declass was held up by POTUS (at the behest of a certain 'ally'), and why they didn't preempt the SC report with any revelations about SIS assets way out in front of all of this, long before CIA fed it to DOJ.

Anyone else note this with any concern, whatsoever?

>>5862678

Prior to the 'Russiagate' distraction & Q's arrival, many antiestablishment folks saw Fox News for what it was: establishment media operating as controlled opposition.

Murdoch-owned, and run by CFR acolyte Ailes.

Now, morons think they're legit, that everything isnt prescreened, and that you can support a tool of the elite in a fight against elites' control.

It's pathetic.

>>5862749

It's always been establishment media. Ailes was a long-time CFR tool.

Why do people think it's anything else?

Oh, yea, Q quotes them constantly.

Apparently, no one here learned what controlled opposition is, or how it's used.

>>5862746

Because they have always been, and still are, establishment media operating as controlled opposition.

Odd that Q hasn't once pointed it out.

Anyone catch the way the Nunes statement was worded to pin everything on proxies in DOJ/FBI.

Wait for the con.

>>5862724

That's complete bs, friend.

There's a long history of the public accepting revelatory news that has been properly litigated, and for which there is demonstrable evidence.

That line is a con. You present evidence, allow disclosure to proceed, and attain convictions. There's zero need to mislead the public.

Doesn't anyone even think about this stuff that people have been repeating? It's self-serving.

>>5862872

Have you even been paying attention?

What does "nothing more, nothing less" mean to you?

Prepare to get conned. They're going to tie a bow on this that precludes any honest analysis of the actual origin of this plot, or the way something like this comes into being.

Pinning it on FBI & DOJ, who certainly have traitors amongst them, some of whom have been fired, is tagging it to minions and proxies who were handfed this info from CIA & others, and which started with SIS assets (Halper/Mifsud/Steele/Downer/etc) astroturfing the landscape.

Come on. Nunes' statement is laying the groundwork for never declassifying what should already have been released unredacted.

Which 'ally' asked for it not to be?

>>5862934

Nine year-olds should go find another place to congregate.

>>5862800

It should be stated outright.

They are not going to air anything that isnt part of the script. Elites' script.

Did they out CIA for coordinating arms running out of Benghazi & into Syria to foment that war there? No.

Neither did Gowdy, and he had all the access he needed to figure that out. We had a DIA doc acknowledging it in 2013.

Folks claim to be 'awake', and then play along with all of the elites' scams. It's shameful. People here should get it by now.

>>5863020

That's fair.

I just don't like the way it's being funneled into a silo.

At best, it was dishonest. I don't see why he couldn't have said FBI/DOJ were corrupted, as were others like Obama & Hillary.

More likely the tarp will be pulled over the field while we're all waiting for a pitching change.

>>5863107

Nothing about those items addresses the control elites hold over this country, nor its infiltration of important agencies and departments.

It's all great, and should all come out (no protecting sources and methods), but it's only a step in the right direction.

And, if that's all it is, it's a con to bury the truth and protect the system - the system designed and directed by elites.

>>5863058

Establishment media is now, somehow, to be trusted, because someone said so, and despite all of what we know about how elites co-opt, steer, and marginalize antiestablishment movements.

Dullards fall for that, but we should be much more circumspect.

>>5862873

CFR man Ailes??

Do you think about what you say before you say it?

>>5863271

>>5862873

Wrong reply. Apologies, anon.

>>5863188

The UK has been involved in US politics and manipulating US public policy and public perceptions since this nation was founded.

>>5863344

It all reads precisely as a controlled opposition script would.

Meanwhile, no yellow vests here. No 9/11 truth. No more antiestablishment movement.

Placation.