Granny played the best part in that show!
Some thoughts.
"Google, Twitter, YouTube, Facebook…"
could be placed in an arc over the tree symbolizing how they keep the tree from growing.
Remove FREE YOUR VOICE from graphic…
FREE YOUR VOICE - SPREAD THE WORD could replace the footer text.
Positive feedback, not negative criticism.
Need glasses much?
The entire building in the center right is out of place. Much newer and/or better maintained than all the rest.
That building also has nine antennas in a row and another in the front while all the others have one or none alt all.
And then there's …
Q - @Snowden We are going LIVE -24 [comb your hair].
So clearly a person with messy hair is being referenced. Like the guy near the bottom with the light blue shirt, back-pack over left shoulder, talking with some girl, who clearly NEEDS TO GET A HAIRCUT.
G_d helps those who help themselves.
Agree completely.
Demo[n]cra[f]ts can only work on sleeping sheeple.
DJT woke enough of them up to remove the spell.
Red-Pilled 'em right dafuQ up.
>>CERN was created to destroy God.
CERN was created to Attack [The Knowledge of] God.
Tower of Babel all over again.
“Those who don't know history are doomed to repeat it.”
― Edmund Burke
Q - @Snowden We are going LIVE -24 [comb your hair].
Clearly @Snowden is visible.
>>Sure, a repainted exterior… bla, bla, bla,.
same could be said about your single floor being repainted.
The roof's been redone, professionally.
TEN antennas on the roof. Where's your wise-ass remark about that?
>>Of course @Snowden should 'comb (his) your hair' because the girl next to him needs to get a haircut. That makes sense…
I'll restate for those who can't follow simple English grammar:
Like the guy near the bottom with the light blue shirt, back-pack over left shoulder, who clearly NEEDS TO GET A HAIRCUT,talking with some girl,
Q - Find @Snowden IDEN +1
Why would Q send us on a wild goose chase.
i.e. if @Snowden can't be IDENtified +1.
General remark, not necessarily referring to CERN.
https:// home.cern/about/experiments
All of there experiments are based on the philosophical assumption that the universe came into being all by itself. Ex-nihilo. When you ask, "How is that possible?", the most candid answer you'll ever get is, "We don't know, but it must be true because, here we are."
I've read Hawking, Brian Green, Tegmark, etc.etc. for the better part of forty years and have yet to find one single, logical, verifiable answer to that question.
How is that possible?
It's all theories and conjectures. No demonstrable facts. Not one.
Here's a simple red-pill for you.
They claim that the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate.
They claim this because the further out we look, the faster the stars are receeding from us.
But…
They also claim that the further away a star is the further back in time you're looking.
If the second claim is true then it must be that the universe was expanding IN THE PAST but no longer expanding today.
If the first claim is true, then we woild perceive the NEAREST stars redeeding away from us the fastest.
Drink, then swallow.