Did I understand this Q post correctly? Do you have same interpretation? Any answers / guesses?

How did @Snowden clear customs/immigration in HK AFTER the public release?

Why wouldn’t he FIRST travel to final destination prior to public release?

If wanted by the US govt would he be cleared to travel?

Who provided support to escape?

Who was the US (United States) after (=chasing) during this time?

JA - have you learned & eliminated L-6?

Use logic.

Q

————

Snowden released the NSA secrets May 2013.

United States was looking for / after someone (Who?), during that time period? Who?

>>586630

>When was the raid on Kim Dotcom?

>>586646

>>586808

US was after Kim Dotcom heavily during that time.

''Eventually it had over 150 employees, US$175 million revenues,[51] and 50 million daily visitors.[52] At its peak Megaupload was estimated to be the 13th most popular site on the Internet and responsible for 4% of all Internet traffic.[52][53]

On 5 January 2012,[54] indictments were filed in Virginia in the United States against Dotcom and other company executives with crimes including racketeering, conspiring to commit copyright infringement, and conspiring to commit money laundering.[55] Two weeks later (20 January), Kim Dotcom, Finn Batato, Mathias Ortmann and Bram van der Kolk were arrested in Coatesville, Auckland, New Zealand, by New Zealand Police, in an armed raid on Dotcom's house involving 76 officers and two helicopters.[56] Assets worth $17 million were seized including eighteen luxury cars, giant screen TVs and works of art. Dotcom's bank accounts were frozen denying him access to US$175m (NZ$218m) in cash, the contents of 64 bank accounts world-wide, including BNZ and Kiwibank accounts in New Zealand, Government bonds and money from numerous PayPal accounts.[57]

Dotcom was remanded to Mt Eden Prison. He subsequently reported: "The first night I didn't have a blanket, soap, toothpaste or toilet paper. They didn't provide us with the basic things… Every two hours, they would wake me up. I was deprived of sleep. I wrote a complaint. I said, 'This is torture, this is sleep deprivation'." He said he was treated like a convicted criminal and was "stunned to be locked up in prison over claims of criminal copyright infringements when accused murderers were bailed to await trial".[58] On 22 February, North Shore District Court Judge Nevin Dawson overturned previous rulings and released Dotcom on bail. The judge considered there was no longer a significant risk that Dotcom would flee the country as all of his assets had been seized by this time, no new assets or bank accounts had been identified, and he had "every reason to stay to be with his family and fight to keep his assets."[59]

High Court

On 28 June 2012, High Court of New Zealand Justice Helen Winkelmann found that the warrants used to seize Dotcom's property were illegal because they were too broad. "These categories of items were defined in such a way that they would inevitably capture within them both relevant and irrelevant material. The police acted on this authorization. The warrants could not authorize seizure of irrelevant material, and are therefore invalid."[60] News emerged later that the Crown knew it was using the wrong order while the raid was in progress and Dotcom should have been given the chance to challenge the seizure.[61] The Crown also revealed that police had handed seized hard drives to FBI staff who copied them at the police crime lab in South Auckland and sent the copies back to the US.[61] Justice Winkelmann ruled that handing the hard drives seized in the raid to the FBI was in breach of extradition legislation and the FBI’s cloning of the hard-drives was also invalid.[60]

Declaring the search warrants to be invalid was a significant victory for Dotcom because he was struggling to pay his mounting legal bills. At a hearing in the High Court on 28 August 2012, Justice Judith Potter allowed Dotcom to withdraw approximately NZ$6 million (US$4.8 million) from his seized funds. He was also allowed to sell nine of his cars. The amount released was to cover $2.6 million in existing legal bills, $1 million in future costs, and another $1 million in rent on his New Zealand mansion.[62]

Extradition decision

In February 2017, the High Court upheld the earlier decision of the district court that Dotcom and his three co-accused could be extradited to the United States. However, Justice Murray Gilbert accepted the argument made by Dotcom's legal team that he and his former Megaupload colleagues cannot be extradited because of copyright infringement. The judge said he made this decision because: "online communication of copyright protected works to the public is not a criminal offence in New Zealand". However, Justice Gilbert said there were "general criminal law fraud provisions" in New Zealand law which covered the actions of the accused and they could be extradited on that basis.[63]

Dotcom saw this decision as a major victory saying: "The major part of this litigation has been won by this judgement - that copyright is not extraditable." The ruling opened the door to further appeals because the warrant which was served on him when he was arrested on 20 January 2012, stated he was being charged specifically with "copyright" offences. Both sides are expected to challenge aspects of the ruling before the New Zealand Court of Appeal and eventually the Supreme Court.[64]''

>>586852

The question for anons is what was the REAL story of Kim Dotcom?

Why was he so heavily chased by US?

Dotcom seems to be on the white hats side, with Assange.

Black hats were after him very heavily?!?

WHY? That's the real question.

>>586860

Did Kim Dotcom do something to piss off the clowns and black hats?

Host too much whistleblower information? Some secret info about global cabal? What?

Now Dotcom has been talking pretty much about Seth Rich and seems friendly with Julian Assange.

>>586862

maybe CP people could have used his servers and he has some toxic evidence about cabal.

>>586879

http:// www.stuff.co.nz/world/americas/6995377/FBI-says-child-porn-found-on-Dotcoms-Megaupload-servers

>>586890

FBI/clowns could even have set this up to indict Dotcom

>>586886

>Note that megaupload had tens of thousands of accounts by staff across the spectrum of the US government and military.

Interesting too…

>>586886

>Note that megaupload had tens of thousands of accounts by staff across the spectrum of the US government and military.

That would become the EFF’s MegaRetrieval campaign.

The revelations of this campaign happen to be quite interesting when it comes to understanding who used the service, for what, and why, according to TorrentFreak:

As part of this process, Megaupload discovered that a large number of Mega accounts are held by US government officials. Today, thanks to fresh information provided to TorrentFreak by Kim Dotcom, we can reveal more details.

From domains including dhs.gov, doe.gov, fbi.gov, hhs.gov, nasa.gov, senate.gov, treas.gov and uscourts.gov, the number of accounts held at Megaupload total 1058. Of these, 344 users went the extra mile and paid for premium access. Between them they uploaded 15,242 files – a total of 1,851,791 MB.

While a couple of million megabytes of lost data is bad enough, another group – the ladies and gentlemen of the US Military – stands to lose much, much more.

Looking at a cross section of .gov domains (including the FBI, NASA, the Senate, etc.) it looks as if they’d held accounts on the order of 1058 accounts, 344 of whom had paid for premium access—between all the accounts they’d uploaded almost 15,242 files weighing in at 1,851,791 MB.

What’s a few million megabytes of lost data between government friends? Then there’s the statistics from the US military.

Domains supporting a .mil TLD totaled 15,364 accounts with an inspiring 10,233 of those paying for premium access—between them they uploaded 340,983 files weighing in at around 96,507,779 MB.

No doubt people might question if these .gov and .mil users happened to be using MegaUpload to commit copyright crimes, and there’s not much information on what percentage of MU users or total data this represents; but it does show that the storage site saw a lot of traffic from sources best known for a little bit of personal ethics who aren’t just so-called pirates.

The takedown of MegaUpload caused chill winds to blow through a blizzard in the cloud because the site seemed pretty legitimate to many other cloud-storage outfits—even if Kim Dotcom does look like a jet-set and sleazy CEO—as a result we’ve seen the closures and reaction from numerous offsite storage outfits like BTJunkie and FileSonic. The impact of this action will be felt for quite some time, especially as people wonder about what powers the RIAA and MPAA and US government should have over suspected copyright infringement in the cloud.

https:// siliconangle.com/blog/2012/03/26/us-military-members-had-more-than-15600-accounts-on-megaupload/

>>586909

yep, even if CP was on his servers doesn't mean he put it there. The title of the article might give that impression to general public… which is the purpose.

CP could be there because of clowns, or contractor of clowns like dyncorp etc…

Whatever happened, I am SURE that Kim Dotcom had some really bad dirt about Clowns and Black Hats

>>586922

That's a good theory too.

• cabal wants to control ALL SOME, they do it with the executive arm: clowns, and their minions FB/Google, …

I think it's also possible that Dotcom had some really bad dirt on clowns. Maybe both.

If Q is referring to Kim Dotcom, we must seriously ask why??

>>586934

That's how the richest families get TOTAL control of the planet.

ANY serious rival, opponent, dissident, … can be taken out with fake evidence and bought courts

>>586959

and power. When you have all the money you have most power.

They probably hated if they couldn't control MegaUpload, or couldn't turn Kim Dotcom's head like they could control Zuckerberg.

Z fell in line and all are happy. Clowns have direct access to that data (similar story with FB, G, Tw)

If they couldn't get FULL access to MegaUpload data, then they must destroy it.

It's all power. which nearly equals money… two sides of the coin.

>>587010

how does it make sense in the context??

JA - have you learned & eliminated L-6?