Anonymous ID: f8dfd7 March 24, 2019, 12:54 p.m. No.5866783   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6849 >>6867 >>6894 >>6947 >>6967 >>6973 >>7000 >>7009 >>7126 >>7145

>>5866510

lawfag here

just read then entire letter

it is a big win for POTUS but meuller left a turd in there

which was oh BTW we did not address the "difficult question" of whether obstruction of justice should be charged

 

well Barr AND RR made short work of that anons and concluded that cuz there was NO underlying crime to cover up there could be no obstruction

DUH

meuller could easily have said that and we should consider why he did not

anons?

Anonymous ID: f8dfd7 March 24, 2019, 1:02 p.m. No.5867000   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7072

>>5866783

lawfag here

it is VERY obvious that no obstruction occurred and that mueller could have said so

now we know why RR was asked to stay

to bless Barr saying what mueller could or should have

yet i CANNOT shake the feelz that this too was planned for a reason

so lets take time to THINK and figure it out anons! or see news unlock

Anonymous ID: f8dfd7 March 24, 2019, 1:05 p.m. No.5867073   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5866793

does NOT say that exactly

says russion hackers got HRC and DNC emails and gave to wiki but not ALL or even WHICH ones

for all we know they got some too but not the ones we all ASSUME he refers to