Anonymous ID: f78bcd March 24, 2019, 1:51 p.m. No.5868189   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8463

>>5867742

I side with BARR !

It is totally irrational to charge someone with obstruction

in an investigation IF NO CRIME WAS COMMITTED .

Mueller has spent $25 Million of taxpayers money. Obstruction seems to have been the only thing that he could remotely accuse

Trump of. Seems that he wanted to make it clear that "Nobody

should say that they are innocent until he, Mueller, says so."

What about First Amendment = Freedom of Speech ? Particularly

when you are SIMPLY TELLING THE TRUTH ! Barr is clearly right !

Anonymous ID: f78bcd March 24, 2019, 2:14 p.m. No.5868667   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5868492

HACKING . . . .

Mueller was unable to get evidence from

Assange / Wikileaks Due to CIA / Brennan objections.

So his Report on the Hacking was based mainly on saying that there was LACK of Evidence !