>>5868832 (LB)
Keep in mind, the corollary to "NO COLLUSION" (reallly just no conspiring
to influence the election) is that there was no predicate crime for Trump
to have obstructed. In other words, you can't obstruct an illegal investigation.
So there's a backhanded "no obstruction," but they know the media won't
report that honestly.
Unless something has been reported, I doubt he will do anything. He
took the plea to protect his sting against the Ukrainian money laundering
operations. Those "associates" of his that were indicted weren't his
associates, they were his clients, some of the targets of his sting.
The big players, of course, are Hillary and company. Note all the
information on the Ukraine coming out now…
They gave back the territory they got from Egypt in that on the promise
of peace. All the haters don't want to admit Israel got attacked from all
sides. The Golan Heights was their prize of sorts. Too bad, so sad.
You don't understand the government, do you?
The director of the FBI doesn't have the power to
indict anybody. Not ever. Only a prosecutor and
argh 2.
Only a prosecutor and a grand jury hand out indictments.
Learn how your government works and all the other things
that matter are easier to understand as well.
>Comey has been covering up for the Clintons for a couple decades. This isn't the first time.
If you call violating policy and releasing information about an
>Comey has been covering up for the Clintons for a couple decades. This isn't the first time.
If you call violating policy and releasing information about an ongoing
investigation "covering up" something, you're delusional. He's lucky he didn't
get arkancided.
Exactly, anon. Other anons need to learn how the process works.
Comey had few good options. He's lucky to be alive.
With Lynch as his boss, who are you trying to fool? So he recommends
prosecution and Lynch clears her, then the "exoneration" is LEGAL
with double jeopardy attached. Do you know what that means?
Yup, the claim just states the obvious: they talked about it.