>>5871957 >>5872004

In a prior thread, some anons asked how the Russia collusion story started. WikiLeaks was not the only alt source reporting early on that Clinton staffers were responsible for launching the idea. This tweet cites a specific source who was close to the insiders.

I thought the $1M bounty for Mueller's report was interesting. The publicly released version will be a huge let down. Anything of real interest will be redacted.

>>5872379

This has been a common practice among the wealthy. They usually give outright gifts to the school for a new building or wing or something. I wouldn't mind if the Trump Admin clears out the swamp by going after them for doing things like this.