>>5875699 (LB)
Digits confirm.
I can almost follow your thinking. Almost.
I swear didn't I just read this essential message between/among anons last bread? We are literally the news now.
>Besides the Comey firing, was not the claim of supposed obstruction of justice based on Comey’s claim that POTUS said something to the effect off “Flynn is good guy go easy on him?” If so, does the fact Flynn supposedly “cooperated” with SC and had absolutely nothing incriminating to offer on Russian collusion, (as evidenced by the revelation that the SC DISCOVERED NO EVIDENCE OF ANY COLLUSION), along with SC’s sentence recommendation for Flynn, being, in effect, “going easy on him,” not completely exonerate POTUS’s suggestion to Comey as anything other than the exact same judgement Mueller demonstrated $40,000,000 and three years later?
>Am I wrong in questioning why know one else is making this point?
Too late for me to rephrase, but I added some punctuation marks which I think helps. No, you are not wrong, and in fact. what intrigues me about your questions is somewhere in the back of my mind I seem to recall Q having hinted something to the effect that Flynn would be exonerated.
Anons?
No, thank you, for the reminder, Anon. Here's moar. Sorry if any are doubles. Not the best at downlowading from QAnon pub.
Funny thing is, I was a "new" (old) fag on /pol – like maybe two months in – when Q first began to drop. Been on board ever since. I do not pretend to follow or even understand it all, but well enough. So thanks again for the reminder.
>Just the tip…so far
I agree; in some ways, the show has just begun. We've only been watching the previews!
Here's the link, tho, to Q Anon pub Flynn search. There' s lots moar, and I am now revisiting the meaning of "Who knows where the bodies are buried?" Still my favorite is
"Rubber bullet?" Plain as day, kek.
https://qanon.pub/?q=Flynn#1283
I gotta hit the sack, phonefag. Gotta be up for work in five hours. Shadilay!