Anonymous ID: 1f8cd0 March 8, 2018, 6:52 a.m. No.588008   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8019 >>8052

>>587968

Enough! This has been debunked and there have been many posts explaining why.

 

This is nothing more than another attempt at diversion.

 

SHILL ALERT!

 

REPEAT…CALLING ALL ANONS…..

 

THIS IS A SHILL ALERT!!!

Anonymous ID: 1f8cd0 March 8, 2018, 7 a.m. No.588062   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8073

>>588044

Because you're the most obvious glowing shill faggot I've tagged since the day I came down here.

 

But thanks for the hint…we are obviously close to a target since the incoming is off the charts.

Anonymous ID: 1f8cd0 March 8, 2018, 7:08 a.m. No.588119   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>588097

By you're logic I have to call you a shill too.

 

SHILL!

 

p.s.: yes, as it's hard enough for people to even listen to irrefutable facts, spreading the five-mile CERN explosion story seems a bit counter-productive. So do me a favor - bite it.

Anonymous ID: 1f8cd0 March 8, 2018, 7:51 a.m. No.588424   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8428 >>8450

>>588187

Thank you anon. The voice of reason!

 

This bulshit story is being placed at the top of each new bread for one of two reasons (generally speaking, of course).

 

  1. Lazy, newfag who either doesn't bother to read what's been posted - which should be discouraged OR

 

  1. Clown-like division disinformation meant to discredit this board and anyone who comes here.

 

The fact that there is absolutely no sauce, save for two previously unheard of websites (and now YuTube videos), should be an immediate red flag. There are thousands of scientists worldwide connected to CERN and we have yet to stumble upon one first-person report about said accident. Not one name of anyone who died has been reported - part of the cover-up I guess.

 

I'm interested to see who will come back next week and say they defended this garbage long after the clowns have moved onto other stories. Perhaps it's the same crowd waiting for President Trump to return the bust of MLK to the Oval Office.

 

Again, thank you for the well-reasoned reply.

Anonymous ID: 1f8cd0 March 8, 2018, 7:57 a.m. No.588459   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>588428

Good point anon. I don't even go that far with the analysis as I more 'conCERNed' with what the 'story' is being used for.

 

It's clowning-101 and the folks here, critical thinkers by and large, should call it out immediately.

 

If nothing else, agree no more reporting UNTIL/and unless, something factual can be added…which I'm betting won't happen. They are laughing their asses off at how far it's gone already.