>HRC and a child.
Or, HRC hit a child
HRC bit a child
HRC and a crime
HRC and a bribe
HRC hit a woman
I know what PDanon said in 4, i won't bank on any conclusions until seeing for myself though
14 posts in, all criticism. Question EVERYTHING, trust is earned, I ge that 100%. YET, have you considered that proving the sheep & lemmings (as you say) wrong with verifiable FACTS, rather than criticism, may be more effective? You make it seem that know something, yet haven't clarified exactly where people are wrong, only pointed fingers telling them that they're wrong. What's your proof, then?
Ok, this is fun for you. You're playing on anons who may have an emotional attachment to Q, which is fine, because I can see it working. Still from you, it's Q this and Q that, like you have a grudge (against government from what I can tell). And, being that you're bringing accusations as well (for at least a couple of hours now), there is a burden of proof for you as well. So, lay it on us. What can you tell us in one post that will change at least some minds here?
Great repetitive talking points. You've revealed yourself as a distraction. Keep up the gaslighting & emotional appeals, again, it seems to be working for you.
https:// www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/federal-interagency-council-crime-prevention-improving-reentry/
https:// www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/federal-interagency-council-crime-prevention-improving-reentry/