>>5918263

I'm of the mind that the plan includes brexit. Cameron was mad to have a referendum. The result was non-binding. It was implemented anyway. May was elected for one reason only: to get the UK out of the EU. Except she did a deal with Merkel to keep us in. Or did she?

The UK provides a shed load of funding to the EU. How much of that comes from Queen Elizabeth, via the Virginia Co and the irs? In other words, the US is funding the EU. Hence getting the UK out of Europe has to be part of the plan.

My current prediction is that we'll discover on Monday April 1st that we left the EU on March 29th, because the extension was illegal.

>>5918821

It's being claimed that EU law trump's UK law, so tough. However, I've seen an article (no sauce) that sez article 50 is specifically written in such a way that UK law trumps EU law in this case. If this is so, then as long as the si votes along with May's wa vote are put off until next week there's still a chance that the extension will be declared illegal.

Finding out we left the EU by accident on April fools day would be delicious. I'd toast pepe with every pint and kek all week long.

>>5919074

The si has to go through the house of Lords too. Only then can it become law. Just need the Lords to delay until Tuesday next week.