>>589573

Needs a new name

>>589645

Absolutely!

A thought- before the 24 th Jan Q referred to Edward Snowden as just Snowden. Since this date it has been @Snowden. Significance-link to @Jack ? His being a clown, something else or of no importance?

>>589890

Could you pls elaborate anon- dummy here! ;)

>>589890

@=a msg to him from Q

>>589940

Ty!

>>590044

What if China, Russia, and others are coordinating w/ POTUS to eliminate the NWO?

Q post