Anonymous ID: 7bf1ea March 26, 2019, 1:27 a.m. No.5899228   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9240 >>9399 >>9587 >>9686 >>9795 >>9855 >>9951

 

[RBG]

 

The splice @19:56 IS in fact [RBG] speaking over a lady BUT the lady was speaking about something totally different ending in a word that IS NOT connected to the sentence that comes before [RBG's] interruption.

 

"The Mississippi Supreme Court ignored what this court had already said about history being relevant and the broader point [RBG interruption] what(?) everything [RBG speaks]

 

Who has good ears? Help me out.

 

What if there's another court case that this attorney argued in front of the Supreme Court that has this interruption in it.