>>5898997 pb Notable.
Just getting on and looking through notes. Didn’t see any follow up on this. Did this anon, or another, ever get any further on this voice analysis? I believe this angle is where Q is pointing us.
Could very be. But I still think comparing the audio Q linked with other audio from older opening arguments is a good idea. I’m workfagging and can’t start looking for anything until late this afternoon. Wasn’t sure if anyone else had seen any similar digs that got anywhere.