that gets a wall, and that gets a wall, everywhere gets a wall. and soon.
>>5901518 that's interdasting
>And the woman attorney (forget her name) who responded to her at one point by saying that the decsion or argument from the court (RBG's opinion?) looked like it was "pasted" into there from a previous ruling or argument.
>ever consider that maybe Q has put forth a challenge
>to real journalists to get a photo?
Yes, that's the point. no eyewitness, no RBG.
She was making rulings from home before, (((their))) fuckery will never end until [their] end.
>walls keep people in, not criminals out.
works both ways for sure.
i'm actually for open borders sometime waaay in the future when the cabal is a bad memory and the psychopaths are busting rocks on the moon and we have all the suppressed tech and jesus has returned. yeah. gonna be sweet. (only partly sarc)
It's the Phoenicians against the Tartarians. the Phoenicians won a long time ago they just been mopping up the remnants using divide and rule.