Anonymous ID: 02bb19 March 26, 2019, 9:53 a.m. No.5903997   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4083 >>4104 >>4273 >>4487

>>5903895

 

Seeing if I can get confirmation real quick, Q:

 

RBG Audio from last night spliced in, and they left in a Kagan fragment, right?

 

https://www.c-span.org/video/?458080-1/flowers-v-mississippi-oral-argument&start=1206

 

At 21:25 Johnson is speaking and says -

 

>"We look at the totality of the circumstances and conduct a sensitive inquiry."

 

And at 21:29, there's audio, but it's from Justice KAGAN, not RBG!!

 

Kagan immediately gets "CUT OFF" by RBG, which the official transcript marks down as:

 

"JUS GINSBURG: [INDISCERNABLE].

 

Except she's perfectly discernible:

 

>"You say your strongest case…"

 

And she interrupts Kagan as Kagan says:

 

>"Ms. Johnson, some-"

 

BUT HERE'S WHERE IT GETS INTERESTING:

 

Tune in again at 22:38!!!

 

IT'S THE EXACT SAME KAGAN CLIP!!!

 

Will be looking at the waveforms shortly, but wanted to see if I'm on the right track.

 

ThankQ!

Anonymous ID: 02bb19 March 26, 2019, 10:01 a.m. No.5904178   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4254

>>5904083

 

No, but I know a very good one. Asked him to take a look at it, and will be posting results if/when he does.

 

>>5904104

 

We'll see if my hunch is correct, but to my ears, it sounds like they edited the clip and left in a fragment!

 

Which makes me wonder WHERE did the source audio for RBG come from???