>>5904802 (lb)
>>5904772 (lb)
"on the move" is obviously more than a "travel-related, imperfectly-controlled, keyboard-unfriendly climate" insinuation. What's "the move"? What's being moved?
So are we talking about someone they found to play the role? Do ya just craigslist that audition call?
What about other Justices being complicit? Or does it really only fall on CJ John Roberts? Are people "in the room" who can tell it's not her (if that's the case) just playing along? Perhaps a Shannon Bream comment about "strong voice" is the furthest they'll go toward hinting that something ain't right?
How many people would have to be co-conspirators?
Maybe this goes on and any tight rulings end up being reversed? (pic related)