>>5905346 (pb)

I noticed that too, fren (assuming you aren't a shill).

However, does it make sense for Q to directly tip them off if they were all being wiretapped, including Foxx and Tina Tchen? No.

Also, do we know that the FISA warrant on Smollett wasn't broad enough to cover these people? If it was, then wouldn't Q's post be valid, since "SMOLLETT" could be a reference to a Smollett FISA wiretap?

You miss the larger point that Q pointed to phone records leak relating to the Smollett case, and that is what is indeed happening. That is not a trivial point.

>>5906166

They are being forced to take drastic measures and risk mistakes.

Will start to go much faster now.

>>5906471

how about starting with a list of all the admitted clowns who are working on the record for the MSM?!? Mudd, Brennan, Clapper, etc.

Don't people stop and ask themselves why the MSM is hiring spies, or the propriety of it all? Aren't spies trained to be experts in deception? It's like asking someone to lie to you when you tune into the MSM. How are is the current state of the MSM any different than Pravda in the USSR? Or state TV in China or NK?

>>5906605

How is a current or former C_A operative or officer (there is no "former" when it comes to them…) allowed to be working for any MSM outlet, or even allowed to give an interview in the media, without being in violation of the statutory prohibition against conducting operations on US soil? Anyone?

There needs to be a strict law against any interaction, other than official spox, between the spy agencies and the media. They are engaging in operations when they interact with the media.