>>590976

What makes you think the two readings of the phrase are mutually exclusive?

You don't think they are clever enough to pick words that indicate location as you said (AYS), and provide tweet confirmation?

And notice I have never suggested that the graphic is 100% "correct." There are too many assumptions in the methodology for me to ever make that claim about that particular one.

However, for some reason you are projecting your own ego issues onto me by trying to suggest I "believe I'm clever."

Here's how this could have gone if you weren't acting like a faggot:

>read the graphic

>recognize the solid pieces of the analysis (bunker tweet and 0600)

>identify the weaker points you think is a stretch (apple yellow sky)

>fold in your own knowledge about the code (AYS = aylesbury)

"Hey anon, that sort of fits but I don't agree with the apple = fruits and the yellow + sky piece. AYS = aylesbury, so maybe Bunker is the valid confirmation and the rest signifies the location."

Even through your bullshit, this is what I still got out of this. You are probably correct about AYS, which if anything just makes the idea stronger, because now it isn't reliant on the admittedly weakest part (bunker being the only thing that is close to verifiable, the rest being assumption).

Learn to collaborate, to entertain ideas without committing to them, and to not throw the baby out with the bath water.