>>5910647 lb

This raid might have been even legal.

If something had been "found" during this raid and would be important enough to prosecute, then this evidence would be needed to present before court, I assume.

You have something obtained, but you cannot use it before court (for whatever legal reasons).

But when the FBI or the police raids an office and coincidentally becomes aware of material that is evidence for an important crime…they would have to bring it before court…and then you have your evidence, where you wanted it to end: at court.

>>5910754

Yes.

And the only way to introduce this evidence to court, was to organise a "raid" and to seize the evidence ="learning" that a serious crime had taken place => which then HAD to be brought before court, where you then could present the evidence for said crime.

Yes.

And Q asked "How do you introduce evidence before court?"

>>5910993

>>5911052

2012!

>>5911105

Yes.

I believe that Cohen is an actor.

Remember his 'mafia' photos?

They were so much fun to watch, he and his buddies were posing for the lurking press.

>>5911449

You're talking about REAL winning?

How dare you! :)))