So I don't know if this was posted here, but I felt it was important to share again
Sgt report on YouTube presents an interview with architects and engineers for 9/11 truth.
I basically came to the same conclusions by watching 20-30 separate videos on 9/11 discrepancies. Some didn't makes sense and some hit home when that little gut feeling tells you - yes that's true .
Also I remember going on YouTube the day after the attacks and finding fairly easy a video clip of the Pentagon wall.
The FBI was going around confiscating all the camera footage from the area but that one made it online somehow.
What I saw with my own eyes was a skinny white long missile- with a little fire/white trail right behind it. Very slim and very fast. Scud missile comes to mind. in the last few seconds it was flying parallel to the ground and maybe 10-15 feet above the ground. The next second it hit the wall and exploded.
I never believed 100% there was a plane there. Even after they conveniently scattered airplane parts on the ground.
Today. It makes much more sense with all the evidence that has come out.
Also if you dig on YouTube you can find an interview with Larry Silverstein where he states, and I'm paraphrasing, the fires and damage of building 7 was so great , that they made the decision to pull it.
You can't just pull a building. The term refers to controlled demolition which involves weeks if not months of planning , placing explosives in very specific locations, breaching structural walls and the use of military grade thermite.
I hope you will find this a good start to investigate for yourselves.
https://youtu.be/u4VA6_TNLoY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p34XrI2Fm6I
Larry states ' firemen' made the decision to ' PULL it'.
flight attendant finds a military base where the planes could have been landed : sheds new light on the patterns and protocols:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7md2QzNsAe4
'methodical deception'